Overall rank by patents
#7,879
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 41 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E06C (Ladders).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Little ranks #7,879 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 41 patents across 6 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R7879 · US Corporation #7,879 · 41 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
Nearest grant-volume peer: Keyssa Systems, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Chiyoda · near
47 score
Keymed (Medical &… · near
47 score
Little Giant Ladder… · this assignee
47 score
Magnolia Medical · near
47 score
Siemens Canada · near
47 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Little's Innovation Score is 47.5/100 (top 18% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Little Giant Ladder Systems, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 58.5% of grants classified under E06C (Ladders). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (12 grants) versus a trough of 7 in 2021. By volume, Little sits between Keyssa Systems, Inc. and Microsemi Solutions (US), Inc..
Little Giant Ladder Systems, LLC shows 28 grants in 2022–2024 against only 7 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Keyssa Systems, Inc.
41 patents
Leister Technologies AG
41 patents
Lifi Labs, Inc.
41 patents
Lite-on Singapore PTE. Ltd.
41 patents
LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.
41 patents
LiveRamp, Inc.
41 patents
Marquardt GMBH
41 patents
Microsemi Solutions (US), Inc.
41 patents
Little Giant Ladder Systems, LLC
41 patents
What this shows Little holds 41 patents at rank #7,878, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #7,878 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Little's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Little, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (47 here).
Little's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
47 Top 18% higher than 82% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 7 | 17.1% |
| 2022 | 12 | 29.3% |
| 2023 | 8 | 19.5% |
| 2024 | 8 | 19.5% |
| 2025partial year | 6 | 14.6% |
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#7,879
of 49,997 tracked assignees
47.5 out of 100
What to do with this data
Little Giant Ladder Systems, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.