Where does Line Plus Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Line Plus Corporation ranks #2,948 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Line Plus Corporation hold?

Line Plus Corporation holds 129 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 23 technology areas.

What is Line Plus Corporation's Innovation Score?

Line Plus Corporation has an Innovation Score of 63.5 out of 100 (top 2% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Line Plus Corporation focus on?

Line Plus Corporation's top technology area is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication) with 81 patents, ranking #456 of 8,956 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 23 CPC subclasses total.

Is Line Plus Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Line Plus Corporation's recent grant velocity is +10800% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Line Plus Corporation's patents?

Line Plus Corporation's patents average 16.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Line Plus Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Line Plus Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 129 granted patents across 23 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Line ranks #2,948 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 129 patents across 23 technology areas.

#2,948
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 2%
by Innovation Score (63.5/100): 16.2
avg claims per patent: +10800%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R2948 · Foreign Corporation #2,948 · 129 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 129 grants
TOP-DECILE #2,948/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Dish Network India…
CPC-FOCUS H04L · 23 areas
INNOV-STRONG 63.5/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +10800% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Dish Network Technologies India Private Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Line’s 63.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 16.8 pts (26%) Velocity 20.0 pts (31%) Breadth 17.0 pts (27%) Claim depth 9.7 pts (15%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Ayar Labs · near

64
Harbin Engineering… · near

64
Line Plus · this assignee

64
Sysmex · near

63
Toshiba Energy… · near

63
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Line's Innovation Score is 63.5/100 (top 2% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Line?

Each dot is one of Line’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Line’s own 16.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Line vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Line's grants concentrate

Line Plus Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 23 CPC subclasses with 62.8% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (44 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Line sits between Dish Network Technologies India Private Limited and Omnissa, LLC.

Line's three-year grant acceleration

Line Plus Corporation shows 96 grants in 2022–2024 against only 14 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Dish Network Indi…

129
Equifax

129
First Data

129
Lenovo Innovation…

129
Millennium Pharma…

129
Nano and Advanced…

129
Omega

129
Omnissa

129
Line Plus ◀

129

What this shows Line holds 129 patents at rank #2,948, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Line

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,948 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Line's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Line, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information), Line ranks #456 of 8,956 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (64 here).

Ayar Labs, Inc. 64 Harbin Engineering University 64 Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation 63 Sysmex Corporation 63

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (16.2 here).

Angel Playing Cards Co., Ltd. 16.2 avg The Government of the United States, as represented by the Secretary of the Army 16.2 avg ZTE (USA) Inc. 16.2 avg Campagnolo S.R.L. 16.2 avg

Line's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

64 Top 2% higher than 98% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Line Plus Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	1	0.8%
2020	1	0.8%
2021	12	9.3%
2022	34	26.4%
2023	44	34.1%
2024	18	14.0%
2025partial year	19	14.7%

Which technologies does Line Plus Corporation patent most?

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 81

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 49

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 33

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 26

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 18

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 10

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 9

H04M - Telephonic Communication 7

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 6

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 4

G01C - Measuring Distances, Levels OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; Gyroscopic INSTRUMENTS; Photogrammetry OR Videogrammetry 3

G09G - Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information 3

G10L - Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding 2

H04S - Stereophonic Systems 2

H04R - Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems 2

Top 15 of 23 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Line Plus Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Line Plus Corporation's lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 62.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
Ranked #2,948 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Line Plus Corporation against Dish Network Technologies India Private Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 63.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.