Leibinger GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B67C (Cleaning, Filling With Liquids OR Semiliquids, OR Emptying, OF Bottles, Jars, Cans, Casks, Barrels, OR Similar Containers, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Funnels).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Leibinger ranks #36,216 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #36,216
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 10th percentile
- by Innovation Score (22.6/100)
- 15.4
- avg claims per patent
- -83%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36216 · Foreign Corporation #36,216 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,216/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Laureate Education
- CPC-NARROW B67C · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 22.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -83% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Laureate Education, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Leibinger’s 22.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Leibinger
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Leibinger · this assignee 23
Leibinger · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Leibinger's Innovation Score is 22.6/100 (10th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Leibinger?
Each dot is one of Leibinger’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Leibinger’s own 15.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Leibinger's grants concentrate
Leibinger GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B67C (Cleaning, Filling With Liquids OR Semiliquids, OR Emptying, OF Bottles, Jars, Cans, Casks, Barrels, OR Similar Containers, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Funnels). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Leibinger sits between Laureate Education, Inc. and LensDigital, LLC.
Who files at Leibinger's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Laureate Education
Laureate Education, Inc.
7 patents
- Layer Zero Power…
Layer Zero Power Systems, Inc.
7 patents
- Leader
Leader Electronics Corp.
7 patents
- Leaf Shave
Leaf Shave Company
7 patents
- Leica Biosystems…
Leica Biosystems Richmond, Inc.
7 patents
- Leisure
Leisure, Inc.
7 patents
- Lenovo
Lenovo
7 patents
- Lensdigital
LensDigital, LLC
7 patents
- Leibinger ◀
Leibinger GmbH
7 patents
What this shows Leibinger holds 7 patents at rank #36,244, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Leibinger
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,244 in granted patent volume.
- Laureate Education, Inc. #36,240 · 7 patents
- Layer Zero Power Systems, Inc. #36,241 · 7 patents
- Leader Electronics Corp. #36,242 · 7 patents
- Leaf Shave Company #36,243 · 7 patents
- Leica Biosystems Richmond, Inc. #36,245 · 7 patents
- Leisure, Inc. #36,246 · 7 patents
- Lenovo #36,247 · 7 patents
- LensDigital, LLC #36,248 · 7 patents
Leaders in B67C (Cleaning)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Leibinger's primary technology class.
Leibinger's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 10th percentile higher than 10% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Leibinger GmbH patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Leibinger GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Leibinger GmbH's lead technology class is B67C (Cleaning, Filling With Liquids OR Semiliquids, OR Emptying, OF Bottles, Jars, Cans, Casks, Barrels, OR Similar Containers, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Funnels), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B67C
- Ranked #36,216 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Leibinger GmbH against Laureate Education, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 22.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.