Leaf Shave Company
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Leaf ranks #36,211 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #36,211
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 42%
- by Innovation Score (38.0/100)
- 12.1
- avg claims per patent
- +500%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36211 · US Corporation #36,211 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,211/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Laser Light Engines
- CPC-NARROW B26B · 1 areas
- INNOV-THIN 38.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 12.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +500% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Laser Light Engines, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Leaf’s 38.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Leaf
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Leaf Shave · this assignee
Leaf Shave · this assignee
38 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Leaf's Innovation Score is 38.0/100 (top 42% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Leaf?
Each dot is one of Leaf’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Leaf’s own 12.1 claims/patent is at or below the 15.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Leaf's grants concentrate
Leaf Shave Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Leaf sits between Laser Light Engines, Inc. and Lenovo.
Leaf's three-year grant acceleration
Leaf Shave Company shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Leaf's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Laser Light Engin…
Laser Light Engines, Inc.
7 patents
- Laureate Education
Laureate Education, Inc.
7 patents
- Layer Zero Power…
Layer Zero Power Systems, Inc.
7 patents
- Leader
Leader Electronics Corp.
7 patents
- Leibinger
Leibinger GmbH
7 patents
- Leica Biosystems…
Leica Biosystems Richmond, Inc.
7 patents
- Leisure
Leisure, Inc.
7 patents
- Lenovo
Lenovo
7 patents
- Leaf Shave ◀
Leaf Shave Company
7 patents
What this shows Leaf holds 7 patents at rank #36,243, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Leaf
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,243 in granted patent volume.
- Laser Light Engines, Inc. #36,239 · 7 patents
- Laureate Education, Inc. #36,240 · 7 patents
- Layer Zero Power Systems, Inc. #36,241 · 7 patents
- Leader Electronics Corp. #36,242 · 7 patents
- Leibinger GmbH #36,244 · 7 patents
- Leica Biosystems Richmond, Inc. #36,245 · 7 patents
- Leisure, Inc. #36,246 · 7 patents
- Lenovo #36,247 · 7 patents
Leaders in B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Leaf's primary technology class.
Leaf's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
38 Top 42% higher than 58% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2022 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2023 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Leaf Shave Company patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Leaf Shave Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Leaf Shave Company's lead technology class is B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B26B
- Ranked #36,211 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Leaf Shave Company against Laser Light Engines, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 38.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.