Layer Zero Power Systems, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02B (Boards, Substations OR Switching Arrangements FOR THE Supply OR Distribution OF Electric Power).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Layer ranks #36,203 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #36,203
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 4th percentile
- by Innovation Score (17.0/100)
- 8.0
- avg claims per patent
- -80%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36203 · US Corporation #36,203 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,203/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Lark
- CPC-NARROW H02B · 2 areas
- INNOV-LOW 17.0/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -80% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Lark Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Layer’s 17.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Layer
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Layer Zero Power… · this assignee 17
Layer Zero Power… · this assignee
17 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Layer's Innovation Score is 17.0/100 (4th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Layer?
Each dot is one of Layer’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Layer’s own 8.0 claims/patent is at or below the 16.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Layer's grants concentrate
Layer Zero Power Systems, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 14.3% of grants classified under H02B (Boards, Substations OR Switching Arrangements FOR THE Supply OR Distribution OF Electric Power). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Layer sits between Lark Technologies, Inc. and Leica Biosystems Richmond, Inc..
Who files at Layer's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Lark
Lark Technologies, Inc.
7 patents
- Larsen & Toubro I…
Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd
7 patents
- Laser Light Engin…
Laser Light Engines, Inc.
7 patents
- Laureate Education
Laureate Education, Inc.
7 patents
- Leader
Leader Electronics Corp.
7 patents
- Leaf Shave
Leaf Shave Company
7 patents
- Leibinger
Leibinger GmbH
7 patents
- Leica Biosystems…
Leica Biosystems Richmond, Inc.
7 patents
- Layer Zero Power… ◀
Layer Zero Power Systems, Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Layer holds 7 patents at rank #36,241, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Layer
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,241 in granted patent volume.
- Lark Technologies, Inc. #36,237 · 7 patents
- Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd #36,238 · 7 patents
- Laser Light Engines, Inc. #36,239 · 7 patents
- Laureate Education, Inc. #36,240 · 7 patents
- Leader Electronics Corp. #36,242 · 7 patents
- Leaf Shave Company #36,243 · 7 patents
- Leibinger GmbH #36,244 · 7 patents
- Leica Biosystems Richmond, Inc. #36,245 · 7 patents
Leaders in H02B (Boards)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Layer's primary technology class.
Layer's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
17 4th percentile higher than 4% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2018 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Layer Zero Power Systems, Inc. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Layer Zero Power Systems, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Layer Zero Power Systems, Inc.'s lead technology class is H02B (Boards, Substations OR Switching Arrangements FOR THE Supply OR Distribution OF Electric Power), 14.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02B
- Ranked #36,203 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Layer Zero Power Systems, Inc. against Lark Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 17.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.