Where does Learning Squared, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Learning Squared, Inc. ranks #29,266 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Learning Squared, Inc. hold?

Learning Squared, Inc. holds 9 US utility patents granted between 2021 and 2025, spanning 10 technology areas.

What is Learning Squared, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Learning Squared, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 50.5 out of 100 (top 13% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Learning Squared, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Learning Squared, Inc..

What does claim depth mean for Learning Squared, Inc.'s patents?

Learning Squared, Inc.'s patents average 19.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Learning Squared, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Learning Squared, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Learning Squared, Inc. focus on?

Learning Squared, Inc.'s top technology area is G09B (Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams) with 8 patents, ranking #122 of 1,127 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 10 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G09B (Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Learning ranks #29,266 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 10 technology areas.

#29,266
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 13%
by Innovation Score (50.5/100): 19.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R29266 · US Corporation #29,266 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
MID-PACK #29,266/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Labyrinth
CPC-FOCUS G09B · 10 areas
INNOV-PAR 50.5/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2021–2025 · 5y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Labyrinth Technologies, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Learning’s 50.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.0 pts (16%) Velocity 20.0 pts (40%) Breadth 11.2 pts (22%) Claim depth 11.4 pts (23%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Dehn SE · near

51
Learning Squared · this assignee

51
Mux · near

51
Onanon · near

51
US Government AS… · near

51
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Learning's Innovation Score is 50.5/100 (top 13% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Learning?

Each dot is one of Learning’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Learning’s own 19.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 6.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Learning vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Learning's grants concentrate

Learning Squared, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 88.9% of grants classified under G09B (Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Learning sits between LYV Life, Inc. and Lemförder Electronic GmbH.

Learning's three-year grant acceleration

Learning Squared, Inc. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

LYV Life

9
Labyrinth

9
Lassen Canyon Nur…

9
Laydon Composites

9
Leehan

9
Leftcoast Innovat…

9
Leifeld Metal Spi…

9
Lemförder

9
Learning Squared ◀

9

What this shows Learning holds 9 patents at rank #29,280, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Learning

By rank, the assignees closest to #29,280 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G09B (Educational OR Demonstration Appliances)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Learning's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Learning, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G09B (Educational OR Demonstration Appliances), Learning ranks #122 of 1,127 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (51 here).

Onanon, Inc. 51 Mux, Inc. 51 Dehn SE 51 US Government AS Represented BY THE Secretary OF THE Army 51

Learning's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

51 Top 13% higher than 87% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2021–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Learning Squared, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2021	1	11.1%
2022	4	44.4%
2023	2	22.2%
2024	1	11.1%
2025partial year	1	11.1%

Which technologies does Learning Squared, Inc. patent most?

G09B - Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams 8

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 6

H04B - Transmission 2

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 2

A63H - Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks 2

G10L - Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding 2

G06K - Graphical Data Reading ; Presentation OF DATA; Record CARRIERS; Handling Record Carriers 1

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 1

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 1

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Learning Squared, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Learning Squared, Inc.'s lead technology class is G09B (Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams), 88.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G09B
Ranked #29,266 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Learning Squared, Inc. against LYV Life, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 50.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.