Overall rank by patents
#5,658
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 60 granted patents across 17 technology areas, active 2020–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A63B (APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT).
The verdict
Curiouser holds 60 US patents across 17 technology areas, rank #5,658 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Curiouser Products Inc. has been granted 60 US utility patents between 2020 and 2025, placing Curiouser Products Inc. at rank #5,658 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 17 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 20.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in A63B (APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT). As a US Corporation, Curiouser Products Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Curiouser sits between Cytokinetics, Inc. (60 patents, rank #5,654) and Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation (60 patents, rank #5,662) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 54.8/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2020 through 2025, with 60 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Curiouser Products Inc.'s 20.6 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 17 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Curiouser Products Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
CYTOKINETICS, INC.
60 patents
CYTONOME/ST, LLC
60 patents
Caraway Home, Inc.
60 patents
Chelsea Building Products, Inc.
60 patents
Cyara Solutions Pty Ltd
60 patents
D5AI LLC
60 patents
DAON HOLDINGS LIMITED
60 patents
Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corporation
60 patents
Curiouser Products Inc.
60 patents
What this shows Curiouser holds 60 patents at rank #5,658, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #5,658 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Curiouser's primary technology class.
Curiouser's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
55 Top 7% higher than 93% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 3.3% |
| 2021 | 17 | 28.3% |
| 2022 | 12 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 21 | 35.0% |
| 2024 | 6 | 10.0% |
| 2025 | 2 | 3.3% |
Top 15 of 17 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#5,658
Across all tracked assignees
54.8 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Curiouser's 60 grants land it in the top 7% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.