Overall rank by patents
#8,242
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 39 granted patents across 20 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61K (PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES).
The verdict
Latency holds 39 US patents across 20 technology areas, rank #8,242 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Latency, Llc has been granted 39 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Latency, Llc at rank #8,242 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 20 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 26.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61K (PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES). As a US Corporation, Latency, Llc is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Latency sits between Lamberti SPA (39 patents, rank #8,238) and Meijo University (39 patents, rank #8,246) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 48.5/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 23 grants, compared with 16 in the 2015–2019 window, a +44% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Latency, Llc's 26.0 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while a multi-domain presence across 20 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Latency, Llc against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
LAMBERTI SPA
39 patents
LINGDONG TECHNOLOGY (BEIJING) CO. LTD.
39 patents
LONGITUDE FLASH MEMORY SOLUTIONS LTD.
39 patents
LS Automotive Technologies Co., Ltd.
39 patents
LeChat
39 patents
Lungpacer Medical Inc.
39 patents
LuxVue Technology Corporation
39 patents
MEIJO UNIVERSITY
39 patents
Latency, LLC
39 patents
What this shows Latency holds 39 patents at rank #8,242, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #8,242 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Latency's primary technology class.
Latency's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
49 Top 16% higher than 84% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 6 | 15.4% |
| 2016 | 3 | 7.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 2.6% |
| 2018 | 6 | 15.4% |
| 2020 | 8 | 20.5% |
| 2021 | 4 | 10.3% |
| 2022 | 3 | 7.7% |
| 2023 | 5 | 12.8% |
| 2024 | 1 | 2.6% |
| 2025 | 2 | 5.1% |
Top 15 of 20 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#8,242
Across all tracked assignees
48.5 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Latency's 39 grants land it in the top 16% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.