Where does Lamberti SPA rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Lamberti SPA ranks #8,239 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Lamberti SPA hold?

Lamberti SPA holds 39 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 27 technology areas.

What is Lamberti SPA's Innovation Score?

Lamberti SPA has an Innovation Score of 40.8 out of 100 (top 35% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Lamberti SPA focus on?

Lamberti SPA's top technology area is C09K (Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere) with 19 patents, ranking #164 of 1,605 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 27 CPC subclasses total.

Is Lamberti SPA's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Lamberti SPA's recent grant velocity is -24% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Lamberti SPA's patents?

Lamberti SPA's patents average 12.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Lamberti SPA patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Lamberti SPA

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 39 granted patents across 27 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C09K (Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Lamberti ranks #8,239 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 39 patents across 27 technology areas.

#8,239
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 35%
by Innovation Score (40.8/100): 12.2
avg claims per patent: -24%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R8239 · Foreign Corporation #8,239 · 39 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 39 grants
UPPER-Q #8,239/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Kason Industries
CPC-FOCUS C09K · 27 areas
INNOV-PAR 40.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DOWN -24% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Kason Industries, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Lamberti’s 40.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 12.7 pts (31%) Velocity 2.4 pts (6%) Breadth 18.4 pts (45%) Claim depth 7.3 pts (18%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Iris International · near

41
Lamberti SPA · this assignee

41
Lynk Labs · near

41
Mentor Worldwide · near

41
TerraLUX · near

41
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Lamberti's Innovation Score is 40.8/100 (top 35% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lamberti?

Each dot is one of Lamberti’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lamberti’s own 12.2 claims/patent is at or below the 15.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Lamberti vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Lamberti's grants concentrate

Lamberti SPA is a focused PatentsView assignee: 27 CPC subclasses with 48.7% of grants classified under C09K (Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (8 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Lamberti sits between Kason Industries, Inc. and Latency, LLC.

Lamberti's three-year grant acceleration

Lamberti SPA shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 14 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Kason Industries

39
Key Technology

39
Kid Stuff Marketi…

39
Lacks Enterprises

39
Lingdong Technolo…

39
Longitude Flash M…

39
LS Automotive

39
Latency

39
Lamberti SPA ◀

39

What this shows Lamberti holds 39 patents at rank #8,238, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Lamberti

By rank, the assignees closest to #8,238 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C09K (Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lamberti's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Lamberti, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C09K (Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications), Lamberti ranks #164 of 1,605 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (41 here).

Iris International, Inc. 41 TerraLUX, Inc. 41 Lynk Labs, Inc. 41 Mentor Worldwide, LLC 41

Lamberti's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

41 Top 35% higher than 65% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Lamberti SPA patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	8	20.5%
2016	4	10.3%
2017	5	12.8%
2018	1	2.6%
2019	3	7.7%
2020	7	17.9%
2021	4	10.3%
2022	4	10.3%
2024	1	2.6%
2025partial year	2	5.1%

Which technologies does Lamberti SPA patent most?

C09K - Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 19

C04B - Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone 7

C09D - Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materials Therefor 7

C08G - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds 6

A01N - Preservation OF Bodies OF Humans OR Animals OR Plants OR Parts Thereof ; Biocides, e.g. AS Disinfectants, AS Pesticides OR AS Herbicides ; Pest Repellants OR ATTRACTANTS; Plant Growth Regulators 6

E21B - Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells 5

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 4

C08F - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds 3

C07C - Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds 2

B41J - TYPEWRITERS; Selective Printing Mechanisms, i.e. Mechanisms Printing Otherwise Than From A FORME; Correction OF Typographical Errors 2

C08B - POLYSACCHARIDES; Derivatives Thereof 2

C10L - Fuels NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Natural GAS; Synthetic Natural GAS Obtained BY Processes NOT Covered BY Subclasses C10g OR C10K; Liquified Petroleum GAS; USE OF Additives TO Fuels OR FIRES; Fire-lighters 2

C10M - Lubricating Compositions ; USE OF Chemical Substances Either Alone OR AS Lubricating Ingredients IN A Lubricating Composition 2

C10N - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass C10m Relating TO Lubricating Compositions 2

A61Q - Specific USE OF Cosmetics OR Similar Toiletry Preparations 2

Top 15 of 27 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Lamberti SPA's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Lamberti SPA's lead technology class is C09K (Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere), 48.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C09K
Ranked #8,239 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Lamberti SPA against Kason Industries, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 40.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.