Lanxess International SA
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 19 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Lanxess ranks #16,945 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 19 technology areas.
- #16,945
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 39%
- by Innovation Score (39.1/100)
- 22.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R16945 · Foreign Corporation #16,945 · 17 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 17 grants
- MID-PACK #16,945/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Kyocera AVX…
- CPC-FOCUS C08F · 19 areas
- INNOV-THIN 39.1/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 22.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Kyocera AVX Components (Werne) GMBH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Lanxess’s 39.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Lanxess
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Lanxess International · this assignee
Lanxess International · this assignee
39 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Lanxess's Innovation Score is 39.1/100 (top 39% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lanxess?
Each dot is one of Lanxess’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lanxess’s own 22.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Lanxess's grants concentrate
Lanxess International SA is a focused PatentsView assignee: 19 CPC subclasses with 88.2% of grants classified under C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Lanxess sits between Kyocera AVX Components (Werne) GMBH and Leyard Optoelectronic Co., Ltd..
Who files at Lanxess's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Kyocera AVX Compo…
Kyocera AVX Components (Werne) GMBH
17 patents
- L3 Cincinnati
L3 Cincinnati Electronics Corporation
17 patents
- Laerdal Medical AS
Laerdal Medical AS
17 patents
- Lantronix
Lantronix, Inc.
17 patents
- LDR Medical S
LDR Medical, S.A.S.
17 patents
- Levita Magnetics…
Levita Magnetics International Corp.
17 patents
- Lexicon Pharmaceu…
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
17 patents
- Leyard Optoelectr…
Leyard Optoelectronic Co., Ltd.
17 patents
- Lanxess Internati… ◀
Lanxess International SA
17 patents
What this shows Lanxess holds 17 patents at rank #16,944, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Lanxess
By rank, the assignees closest to #16,944 in granted patent volume.
- Kyocera AVX Components (Werne) GMBH #16,940 · 17 patents
- L3 Cincinnati Electronics Corporation #16,941 · 17 patents
- Laerdal Medical AS #16,942 · 17 patents
- Lantronix, Inc. #16,943 · 17 patents
- LDR Medical, S.A.S. #16,945 · 17 patents
- Levita Magnetics International Corp. #16,946 · 17 patents
- Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. #16,947 · 17 patents
- Leyard Optoelectronic Co., Ltd. #16,948 · 17 patents
Leaders in C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Invol…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lanxess's primary technology class.
Lanxess's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
39 Top 39% higher than 61% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 29.4% |
| 2016 | 9 | 52.9% |
| 2017 | 1 | 5.9% |
| 2018 | 1 | 5.9% |
| 2019 | 1 | 5.9% |
Which technologies does Lanxess International SA patent most?
Top 15 of 19 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Lanxess International SA's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Lanxess International SA's lead technology class is C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds), 88.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C08F
- Ranked #16,945 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Lanxess International SA against Kyocera AVX Components (Werne) GMBH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 39.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.