Where does Landscape Forms, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Landscape Forms, Inc. ranks #3,122 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Landscape Forms, Inc. hold?

Landscape Forms, Inc. holds 121 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Landscape Forms, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Landscape Forms, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 34.6 out of 100 (48th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Landscape Forms, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Landscape Forms, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +95% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Landscape Forms, Inc.'s patents?

Landscape Forms, Inc.'s patents average 1.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Landscape Forms, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Landscape Forms, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Landscape Forms, Inc. focus on?

Landscape Forms, Inc.'s top technology area is F21S (Non-portable Lighting DEVICES; Systems THEREOF; Vehicle Lighting Devices Specially Adapted FOR Vehicle Exteriors) with 3 patents, ranking #428 of 1,094 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 121 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F21S (Non-portable Lighting DEVICES; Systems THEREOF; Vehicle Lighting Devices Specially Adapted FOR Vehicle Exteriors).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Landscape ranks #3,122 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 121 patents across 3 technology areas.

#3,122
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 48th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.6/100): 1.5
avg claims per patent: +95%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3122 · US Corporation #3,122 · 121 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 121 grants
TOP-DECILE #3,122/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Georgia-Pacific…
CPC-NARROW F21S · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 34.6/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +95% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Landscape’s 34.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 16.6 pts (48%) Velocity 11.0 pts (32%) Breadth 6.1 pts (18%) Claim depth 0.9 pts (3%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Comenity · near

35
Landscape Forms · this assignee

35
LBP Manufacturing · near

35
Oclaro Japan · near

35
Seton Hall University · near

35
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Landscape's Innovation Score is 34.6/100 (48th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Landscape?

Each dot is one of Landscape’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Landscape’s own 1.5 claims/patent is at or below the 11.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Landscape vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Landscape's grants concentrate

Landscape Forms, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 2.5% of grants classified under F21S (Non-portable Lighting DEVICES; Systems THEREOF; Vehicle Lighting Devices Specially Adapted FOR Vehicle Exteriors). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (40 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2019. By volume, Landscape sits between Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP and Shukla Medical.

Landscape's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Landscape Forms, Inc. moved from 29 to 48 grants (1.66x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #340. See the growth leaderboard.

Georgia-pacific C…

121
Glaxosmithkline

121
Hefei BOE Display…

121
Institute of Auto…

121
Purac Biochem BV

121
Shinkawa

121
Sunrise Memory

121
Shukla Medical

121
Landscape Forms ◀

121

What this shows Landscape holds 121 patents at rank #3,122, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Landscape

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,122 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F21S (Non-portable Lighting Devices)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Landscape's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Landscape, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F21S (Non-portable Lighting Devices), Landscape ranks #428 of 1,094 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (35 here).

Oclaro Japan, Inc. 35 Comenity LLC 35 LBP Manufacturing LLC 35 Seton Hall University 35

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (1.5 here).

SDI Technologies, Inc. 1.5 avg Cartier International AG 1.5 avg Zhejiang Taotao Vehicles Co., Ltd 1.5 avg Christian Dior Couture 1.5 avg

Landscape's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

35 48th percentile higher than 48% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Landscape Forms, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	8	6.6%
2016	14	11.6%
2017	5	4.1%
2018	8	6.6%
2019	3	2.5%
2020	10	8.3%
2021	16	13.2%
2022	4	3.3%
2023	4	3.3%
2024	40	33.1%
2025partial year	9	7.4%

Which technologies does Landscape Forms, Inc. patent most?

F21S - Non-portable Lighting DEVICES; Systems THEREOF; Vehicle Lighting Devices Specially Adapted FOR Vehicle Exteriors 3

F21V - Functional Features OR Details OF Lighting Devices OR Systems THEREOF; Structural Combinations OF Lighting Devices With Other Articles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

F21Y - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k, F21l, F21s and F21v, Relating TO THE Form OR THE Kind OF THE Light Sources OR OF THE Colour OF THE Light Emitted 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Landscape Forms, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Landscape Forms, Inc.'s lead technology class is F21S (Non-portable Lighting DEVICES; Systems THEREOF; Vehicle Lighting Devices Specially Adapted FOR Vehicle Exteriors), 2.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F21S
Ranked #3,122 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Landscape Forms, Inc. against Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 34.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.