Labinal, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 23 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02B (Boards, Substations OR Switching Arrangements FOR THE Supply OR Distribution OF Electric Power).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Labinal ranks #13,016 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 23 patents across 11 technology areas.
- #13,016
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 39th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.8/100)
- 15.1
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R13016 · US Corporation #13,016 · 23 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 23 grants
- MID-PACK #13,016/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Kinetic Internationa…
- CPC-FOCUS H02B · 11 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Kinetic Technologies International Holdings LP (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Labinal’s 31.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Labinal
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Labinal · this assignee 32
Labinal · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Labinal's Innovation Score is 31.8/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Labinal?
Each dot is one of Labinal’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Labinal’s own 15.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Labinal's grants concentrate
Labinal, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 60.9% of grants classified under H02B (Boards, Substations OR Switching Arrangements FOR THE Supply OR Distribution OF Electric Power). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (16 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Labinal sits between Kinetic Technologies International Holdings LP and Lontium Semiconductor Corporation.
Who files at Labinal's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Kinetic Internati…
Kinetic Technologies International Holdings LP
23 patents
- Kraco Enterprises
Kraco Enterprises, LLC.
23 patents
- Kverneland Group…
Kverneland Group Kerteminde AS
23 patents
- Københavns Univer…
Københavns Universitet
23 patents
- Lanzhou Institute…
Lanzhou Institute OF Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy OF Sciences
23 patents
- Leeno Industrial
Leeno Industrial Inc.
23 patents
- Loma Linda Univer…
Loma Linda University Medical Center
23 patents
- Lontium Semicondu…
Lontium Semiconductor Corporation
23 patents
- Labinal ◀
Labinal, LLC
23 patents
What this shows Labinal holds 23 patents at rank #13,012, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Labinal
By rank, the assignees closest to #13,012 in granted patent volume.
- Kinetic Technologies International Holdings LP #13,008 · 23 patents
- Kraco Enterprises, LLC. #13,009 · 23 patents
- Kverneland Group Kerteminde AS #13,010 · 23 patents
- Københavns Universitet #13,011 · 23 patents
- Lanzhou Institute OF Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy OF Sciences #13,013 · 23 patents
- Leeno Industrial Inc. #13,014 · 23 patents
- Loma Linda University Medical Center #13,015 · 23 patents
- Lontium Semiconductor Corporation #13,016 · 23 patents
Leaders in H02B (Boards)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Labinal's primary technology class.
Labinal's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 4.3% |
| 2016 | 16 | 69.6% |
| 2017 | 4 | 17.4% |
| 2018 | 2 | 8.7% |
Which technologies does Labinal, LLC patent most?
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Labinal, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Labinal, LLC's lead technology class is H02B (Boards, Substations OR Switching Arrangements FOR THE Supply OR Distribution OF Electric Power), 60.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02B
- Ranked #13,016 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Labinal, LLC against Kinetic Technologies International Holdings LP, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.