Where does Komet Group GmbH rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Komet Group GmbH ranks #13,520 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Komet Group GmbH hold?

Komet Group GmbH holds 22 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2021, spanning 13 technology areas.

What is Komet Group GmbH's Innovation Score?

Komet Group GmbH has an Innovation Score of 34.6 out of 100 (48th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Komet Group GmbH focus on?

Komet Group GmbH's top technology area is B23B (TURNING; Boring) with 13 patents, ranking #34 of 490 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 13 CPC subclasses total.

Is Komet Group GmbH's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Komet Group GmbH's recent grant velocity is -71% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Komet Group GmbH's patents?

Komet Group GmbH's patents average 18.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Komet Group GmbH patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Komet Group GmbH

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 22 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B23B (TURNING; Boring).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Komet ranks #13,520 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 22 patents across 13 technology areas.

#13,520
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 48th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.6/100): 18.4
avg claims per patent: -71%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R13520 · Foreign Corporation #13,520 · 22 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 22 grants
MID-PACK #13,520/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Kadmon
CPC-FOCUS B23B · 13 areas
INNOV-THIN 34.6/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -71% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Kadmon Corporation, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Komet’s 34.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.8 pts (31%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 12.7 pts (37%) Claim depth 11.1 pts (32%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Komet Group · this assignee

35
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Komet's Innovation Score is 34.6/100 (48th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Komet?

Each dot is one of Komet’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Komet’s own 18.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Komet vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Komet's grants concentrate

Komet Group GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 59.1% of grants classified under B23B (TURNING; Boring). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (7 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2018. By volume, Komet sits between Kyungshin Corp. and L'ORÉAL USA Creative, Inc..

Kyungshin

22
Kadmon

22
King Faisal Speci…

22
Kinnos

22
Kondex

22
Kwikset

22
KÖRBER

22
L'orÉAL USA Creat…

22
Komet Group ◀

22

What this shows Komet holds 22 patents at rank #13,522, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Komet

By rank, the assignees closest to #13,522 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B23B (Turning)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Komet's primary technology class.

Komet's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

35 48th percentile higher than 48% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Komet Group GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	7	31.8%
2016	5	22.7%
2017	3	13.6%
2018	2	9.1%
2020	2	9.1%
2021	3	13.6%

Which technologies does Komet Group GmbH patent most?

B23B - TURNING; Boring 13

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 12

B23D - PLANING; SLOTTING; SHEARING; BROACHING; SAWING; FILING; SCRAPING; Like Operations FOR Working Metal BY Removing Material, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 8

B23Q - Details, Components, OR Accessories FOR Machine Tools, e.g. Arrangements FOR Copying OR Controlling ; Machine Tools IN General Characterised BY THE Construction OF Particular Details OR COMPONENTS; Combinations OR Associations OF Metal-working Machines, NOT Directed TO A Particular Result 8

B23C - Milling 7

B23P - Metal-working NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Combined OPERATIONS; Universal Machine Tools 4

H01F - MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Magnetic Properties 3

H02J - Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy 3

H04B - Transmission 3

B24B - Machines, Devices, OR Processes FOR Grinding OR Polishing ; Dressing OR Conditioning OF Abrading SURFACES; Feeding OF Grinding, Polishing, OR Lapping Agents 2

B23K - Soldering OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; Cladding OR Plating BY Soldering OR WELDING; Cutting BY Applying Heat Locally, e.g. Flame CUTTING; Working BY Laser Beam 2

F16B - Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing 1

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 1

Top 13 of 13 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Komet Group GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Komet Group GmbH's lead technology class is B23B (TURNING; Boring), 59.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B23B
Ranked #13,520 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Komet Group GmbH against Kyungshin Corp., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 34.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.