Kwikset Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 22 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Kwikset ranks #13,524 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 22 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #13,524
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 23rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.2/100)
- 10.7
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R13524 · US Corporation #13,524 · 22 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 22 grants
- MID-PACK #13,524/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH King Faisal…
- CPC-NARROW E05B · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.2/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Kwikset’s 27.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Kwikset
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Kwikset · this assignee 27
Kwikset · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Kwikset's Innovation Score is 27.2/100 (23rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kwikset?
Each dot is one of Kwikset’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kwikset’s own 10.7 claims/patent is at or below the 15.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Kwikset's grants concentrate
Kwikset Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (16 grants) versus a trough of 6 in 2016. By volume, Kwikset sits between King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre and Latelec.
Who files at Kwikset's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- King Faisal Speci…
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre
22 patents
- Kinnos
Kinnos Inc.
22 patents
- Komet Group
Komet Group GmbH
22 patents
- Kondex
Kondex Corporation
22 patents
- KÖRBER
KÖRBER Technologies GMBH
22 patents
- L'orÉAL USA Creat…
L'ORÉAL USA Creative, Inc.
22 patents
- Lasko Operations…
Lasko Operations Holdings LLC
22 patents
- Latelec
Latelec
22 patents
- Kwikset ◀
Kwikset Corporation
22 patents
What this shows Kwikset holds 22 patents at rank #13,524, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Kwikset
By rank, the assignees closest to #13,524 in granted patent volume.
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre #13,520 · 22 patents
- Kinnos Inc. #13,521 · 22 patents
- Komet Group GmbH #13,522 · 22 patents
- Kondex Corporation #13,523 · 22 patents
- KÖRBER Technologies GMBH #13,525 · 22 patents
- L'ORÉAL USA Creative, Inc. #13,526 · 22 patents
- Lasko Operations Holdings LLC #13,527 · 22 patents
- Latelec #13,528 · 22 patents
Leaders in E05B (Locks)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kwikset's primary technology class.
Kwikset's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 23rd percentile higher than 23% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 16 | 72.7% |
| 2016 | 6 | 27.3% |
Which technologies does Kwikset Corporation patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Kwikset Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Kwikset Corporation's lead technology class is E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E05B
- Ranked #13,524 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Kwikset Corporation against King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.