Kenford Industrial Company Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Kenford ranks #22,857 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #22,857
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 5th percentile
- by Innovation Score (18.9/100)
- 6.5
- avg claims per patent
- -91%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R22857 · Foreign Corporation #22,857 · 12 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
- MID-PACK #22,857/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Somic Ishikawa
- CPC-NARROW A45D · 3 areas
- INNOV-LOW 18.9/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -91% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Kabushiki Kaisha Somic Ishikawa (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Kenford’s 18.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Kenford
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Kenford Industrial · this assignee 19
Kenford Industrial · this assignee
19 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Kenford's Innovation Score is 18.9/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kenford?
Each dot is one of Kenford’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kenford’s own 6.5 claims/patent is at or below the 10.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Kenford's grants concentrate
Kenford Industrial Company Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Kenford sits between Kabushiki Kaisha Somic Ishikawa and KLS Martin, L.P..
Who files at Kenford's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Somic Ishikawa
Kabushiki Kaisha Somic Ishikawa
12 patents
- Kalamazoo Holdings
Kalamazoo Holdings, Inc.
12 patents
- KAO
KAO Corporation S.A.
12 patents
- KC IP Holdings
KC IP Holdings, LLC
12 patents
- Kerneos
Kerneos
12 patents
- Kingbright
Kingbright Electronics Co. Ltd.
12 patents
- Kitazato
Kitazato Corporation
12 patents
- KLS Martin
KLS Martin, L.P.
12 patents
- Kenford Industrial ◀
Kenford Industrial Company Ltd.
12 patents
What this shows Kenford holds 12 patents at rank #22,847, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Kenford
By rank, the assignees closest to #22,847 in granted patent volume.
- Kabushiki Kaisha Somic Ishikawa #22,843 · 12 patents
- Kalamazoo Holdings, Inc. #22,844 · 12 patents
- KAO Corporation S.A. #22,845 · 12 patents
- KC IP Holdings, LLC #22,846 · 12 patents
- Kerneos #22,848 · 12 patents
- Kingbright Electronics Co. Ltd. #22,849 · 12 patents
- Kitazato Corporation #22,850 · 12 patents
- KLS Martin, L.P. #22,851 · 12 patents
Leaders in A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kenford's primary technology class.
Kenford's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
19 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 5 | 41.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2018 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 3 | 25.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 8.3% |
Which technologies does Kenford Industrial Company Ltd. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Kenford Industrial Company Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Kenford Industrial Company Ltd.'s lead technology class is A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A45D
- Ranked #22,857 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Kenford Industrial Company Ltd. against Kabushiki Kaisha Somic Ishikawa, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 18.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.