Overall rank by patents
#17,825
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 6 technology areas, active 2016–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A63B (APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT).
The verdict
Kelly holds 16 US patents across 6 technology areas, rank #17,825 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Kelly Slater Wave Company, Llc has been granted 16 US utility patents between 2016 and 2025, placing Kelly Slater Wave Company, Llc at rank #17,825 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 6 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in A63B (APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT). As a US Corporation, Kelly Slater Wave Company, Llc is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Kelly sits between KURT Manufacturing Company, Inc. (16 patents, rank #17,821) and Kodiak Robotics, Inc. (16 patents, rank #17,829) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 35.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 10 grants, compared with 6 in the 2015–2019 window, a +67% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Kelly Slater Wave Company, Llc's 17.9 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 6 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Kelly Slater Wave Company, Llc against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
KURT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
16 patents
KUZCO LIGHTING LLC
16 patents
KWH MIRKA LTD
16 patents
Kann Manufacturing Corporation
16 patents
Kenyon International, Inc.
16 patents
Kinetic Technologies
16 patents
Klarna Bank AB
16 patents
Kodiak Robotics, Inc.
16 patents
Kelly Slater Wave Company, LLC
16 patents
What this shows Kelly holds 16 patents at rank #17,825, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #17,825 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kelly's primary technology class.
Kelly's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
36 Top 48% higher than 52% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2017 | 2 | 12.5% |
| 2018 | 2 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2020 | 3 | 18.8% |
| 2021 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2022 | 2 | 12.5% |
| 2023 | 2 | 12.5% |
| 2024 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2025 | 1 | 6.3% |
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#17,825
Across all tracked assignees
35.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Kelly's 16 grants land it in the top 48% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.