Overall rank by patents
#36,029
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 9 technology areas, active 2015–2016. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G05D (SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES).
The verdict
Jaybridge holds 7 US patents across 9 technology areas, rank #36,029 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Jaybridge Robotics, Inc. has been granted 7 US utility patents between 2015 and 2016, placing Jaybridge Robotics, Inc. at rank #36,029 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 9 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 24.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in G05D (SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES). As a US Corporation, Jaybridge Robotics, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Jaybridge sits between James C. White Company, Inc. (7 patents, rank #36,025) and Jergens, Inc. (7 patents, rank #36,033) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 32.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 7 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Jaybridge Robotics, Inc.'s 24.0 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 9 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Jaybridge Robotics, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
James C. White Company, Inc.
7 patents
Janus Technology Solutions, LLC
7 patents
Japan Elastomer Co., Ltd.
7 patents
Jasper Design Automation, Inc.
7 patents
JelliSee Ophthalmics Inc.
7 patents
Jena-Optronik GmbH
7 patents
Jenesis International Inc.
7 patents
Jergens, Inc.
7 patents
Jaybridge Robotics, Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Jaybridge holds 7 patents at rank #36,029, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,029 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Jaybridge's primary technology class.
Jaybridge's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 Top 60% higher than 40% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 71.4% |
| 2016 | 2 | 28.6% |
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#36,029
Across all tracked assignees
32.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Jaybridge's 7 grants land it in the top 60% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.