Where does Jamm Technologies, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Jamm Technologies, Inc. ranks #47,902 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Jamm Technologies, Inc. hold?

Jamm Technologies, Inc. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2023, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Jamm Technologies, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Jamm Technologies, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 29.1 out of 100 (29th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Jamm Technologies, Inc. focus on?

Jamm Technologies, Inc.'s top technology area is B29L (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles) with 3 patents, ranking #777 of 2,540 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is Jamm Technologies, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Jamm Technologies, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Jamm Technologies, Inc.'s patents?

Jamm Technologies, Inc.'s patents average 19.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Jamm Technologies, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Jamm Technologies, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B29L (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Jamm ranks #47,902 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 5 technology areas.

#47,902
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 29th percentile
by Innovation Score (29.1/100): 19.4
avg claims per patent: -33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R47902 · Foreign Corporation #47,902 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #47,902/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Jacob Jensen Design…
CPC-NARROW B29L · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 29.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DOWN -33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Jacob Jensen Design A/S (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Jamm’s 29.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (21%) Velocity 3.3 pts (11%) Breadth 7.9 pts (27%) Claim depth 11.6 pts (40%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Jamm · this assignee

29
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Jamm's Innovation Score is 29.1/100 (29th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Jamm?

Each dot is one of Jamm’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Jamm’s own 19.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 7.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Jamm vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Jamm's grants concentrate

Jamm Technologies, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under B29L (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles). By volume, Jamm sits between Jacob Jensen Design A/S and Japan Chain Terminal Co., Ltd..

Jamm's three-year grant acceleration

Jamm Technologies, Inc. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Jacob Jensen Desi…

5
Jacobus Pharmaceu…

5
Jagtech AS

5
JAM Packaging

5
Janibell

5
Janicek Picks S R…

5
Japan Blue Energy

5
Japan Chain Termi…

5
Jamm ◀

5

What this shows Jamm holds 5 patents at rank #47,902, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Jamm

By rank, the assignees closest to #47,902 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B29L (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Jamm's primary technology class.

Jamm's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 29th percentile higher than 29% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Jamm Technologies, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	20.0%
2018	1	20.0%
2019	1	20.0%
2020	1	20.0%
2023	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Jamm Technologies, Inc. patent most?

B29L - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles 3

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 3

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 3

G06K - Graphical Data Reading ; Presentation OF DATA; Record CARRIERS; Handling Record Carriers 2

H01Q - Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials 2

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Jamm Technologies, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Jamm Technologies, Inc.'s lead technology class is B29L (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B29L
Ranked #47,902 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Jamm Technologies, Inc. against Jacob Jensen Design A/S, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 29.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.