Overall rank by patents
#47,900
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2020–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B03C (MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS).
The verdict
Jagtech holds 5 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #47,900 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Jagtech AS has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2020 and 2025, placing Jagtech AS at rank #47,900 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 14.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in B03C (MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS). As a Foreign Corporation, Jagtech AS is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Jagtech sits between J.m. Canty Inc. (5 patents, rank #47,896) and Janicek Picks, S.r.o. (5 patents, rank #47,904) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 41.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2020 through 2025, with 5 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Jagtech AS's 14.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Jagtech AS against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
J.M. CANTY INC.
5 patents
JACKSON KAYAK, INC.
5 patents
JACOB JENSEN DESIGN A/S
5 patents
JACOBUS PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC.
5 patents
JAM PACKAGING LLC
5 patents
JAMM Technologies, Inc.
5 patents
JANIBELL, INC.
5 patents
JANICEK PICKS, S.R.O.
5 patents
JAGTECH AS
5 patents
What this shows Jagtech holds 5 patents at rank #47,900, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #47,900 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Jagtech's primary technology class.
Jagtech's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
42 Top 32% higher than 68% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2025 | 1 | 20.0% |
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#47,900
Across all tracked assignees
41.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Jagtech's 5 grants land it in the top 32% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.