CPC technology class · B03
B03C - Magnetic OR Electrostatic Separation OF Solid Materials F…
Magnetic or electrostatic separation of solid materials from solid materials or fluids; separation by high-voltage electric fields. 2,224 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 2,224
- US patents granted
- B03
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- +14%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Magnetic OR Electrostatic Separation OF Solid Materials F… ranks #359 of 670 CPC technology areas - 2,224 US patents granted since 2015, with filing up 14% over five years.
- #359
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 2,224
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Lg
- leading assignee (36)
- +14%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass B03C - MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS - covers 2,224 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class B03 (SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTR). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in B03C is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. LG Electronics Inc. leads with 36 patents, followed by Berkeley Lights, Inc. at 23 grants and Global Plasma Solutions, Inc. at 19.
Filing activity in B03C is up 14% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a relatively steady filing pace. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is B03C innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in B03C, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 14% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads B03C?
The 12 most active assignees in MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS - wider bars mean more grants
- Adey Holdings (2008)
ADEY HOLDINGS (2008) LIMITED
31 patents
- Berkeley Lights
Berkeley Lights, Inc.
23 patents
- Global Plasma Solutio…
Global Plasma Solutions, Inc.
19 patents
- Cidra Corporate Servi…
CIDRA CORPORATE SERVICES LLC
15 patents
- Biological Dynamics
BIOLOGICAL DYNAMICS, INC.
13 patents
- Exact Sciences 12
Exact Sciences Corporation
12 patents
- Cameron Solutions 12
CAMERON SOLUTIONS, INC.
12 patents
- Qwtip 11
QWTIP LLC
11 patents
- Gen-probe Incorporated 10
GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED
10 patents
- Advanced Liquid Logic 10
Advanced Liquid Logic, Inc.
10 patents
- Genapsys 9
GENAPSYS, INC.
9 patents
- Cameron International 8
CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
8 patents
What this shows Lg is the most active filer in B03C, holding 36 of the 2,224 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in B03C |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | ADEY Holdings (2008) Limited | 31 |
| #2 | Berkeley Lights, Inc. | 23 |
| #3 | Global Plasma Solutions, Inc. | 19 |
| #4 | Cidra Corporate Services Llc | 15 |
| #5 | Biological Dynamics, Inc. | 13 |
| #6 | Exact Sciences Corporation | 12 |
| #7 | Cameron Solutions, Inc. | 12 |
| #8 | Qwtip Llc | 11 |
| #9 | Gen-probe Incorporated | 10 |
| #10 | Advanced Liquid Logic, Inc. | 10 |
| #11 | Genapsys, Inc. | 9 |
| #12 | Cameron International Corporation | 8 |
| #13 | Sysmex Corporation | 8 |
| #14 | Luminex Corporation | 8 |
| #15 | Menarini Silicon Biosystems S.p.a. | 8 |
| #16 | Environmental Management Confederation, Inc. | 8 |
| #17 | Fluid-screen, Inc. | 8 |
| #18 | Microjet Technology Co., Ltd. | 7 |
| #19 | Inguran, Llc | 7 |
| #20 | Agents AIR Llc | 7 |
About This Class
CPC subclass B03C belongs to class B03.
2,224 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading B03C assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 B03C assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in B03C. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class B03C?
How many patents have been filed in B03C?
Which company holds the most patents in B03C?
How is patent data for B03C collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.