USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Istanbul Teknik Universitesi

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 29 granted patents across 47 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION).

29
Total patents granted
47
CPC technology areas
6.7
Avg claims per patent
+475%
5-year grant velocity

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Istanbul ranks #10,654 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 29 patents across 47 technology areas.

#10,654
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 18%
by Innovation Score (47.9/100)
6.7
avg claims per patent
+475%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Istanbul Teknik Universitesi has been granted 29 US utility patents between 2016 and 2025, placing Istanbul Teknik Universitesi at #10,654 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 47 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 6.7 claims per patent with primary concentration in H04L (TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION). As a Foreign Corporation, Istanbul Teknik Universitesi is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Istanbul sits between Hoerbiger Antriebstechnik Holding Gmbh (29 patents, rank #10,647) and In Ovation Llc (29 patents, rank #10,655) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 47.9/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 23 grants, compared with 4 in the 2015–2019 window, a +475% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Istanbul Teknik Universitesi's 6.7 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 47 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Who files at Istanbul's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Istanbul holds 29 patents at rank #10,651, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Istanbul

By rank, the assignees closest to #10,651 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Istanbul's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Istanbul, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Istanbul's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

48 Top 18% higher than 82% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 201620182019202020212022202320242025 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Istanbul Teknik Universitesi patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 1 3.4%
2018 2 6.9%
2019 1 3.4%
2020 5 17.2%
2021 5 17.2%
2022 4 13.8%
2023 5 17.2%
2024 4 13.8%
2025partial year 2 6.9%

Grant record at a glance

Portfolio Volume 29 grants
CPC subclasses 47
Avg. claims / grant 6.7
Velocity +475%

Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#10,654

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

47.9 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does Istanbul Teknik Universitesi rank among US patent assignees?
According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Istanbul Teknik Universitesi ranks #10,654 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.
How many patents does Istanbul Teknik Universitesi hold?
Istanbul Teknik Universitesi holds 29 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 47 technology areas.
What is Istanbul Teknik Universitesi's Innovation Score?
Istanbul Teknik Universitesi has an Innovation Score of 47.9 out of 100 (top 18% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Istanbul Teknik Universitesi focus on?
Istanbul Teknik Universitesi's top technology area is H04L (TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION) with 8 patents. Grants appear in 47 CPC subclasses total.
Is Istanbul Teknik Universitesi's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?
Istanbul Teknik Universitesi's recent grant velocity is +475% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.
What does claim depth mean for Istanbul Teknik Universitesi's patents?
Istanbul Teknik Universitesi's patents average 6.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.
How is the Istanbul Teknik Universitesi patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Istanbul's 29 grants land it in the top 18% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Istanbul ranks #10,654 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in H04L - see who else leads that technology area. H04L leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.