USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 9 technology areas, active 2016–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F41A (FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OR DETAILS COMMON TO BOTH SMALLARMS AND ORDNANCE, e.g. CANNONS; MOUNTINGS FOR SMALLARMS OR ORDNANCE).

12
Total patents granted
9
CPC technology areas
18.3
Avg claims per patent
+200%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Israel holds 12 US patents across 9 technology areas, rank #22,772 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#22,772
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 33%
by Innovation Score (41.5/100)
18.3
avg claims per patent
+200%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd. has been granted 12 US utility patents between 2016 and 2025, placing Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd. at rank #22,772 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 9 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in F41A (FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OR DETAILS COMMON TO BOTH SMALLARMS AND ORDNANCE, e.g. CANNONS; MOUNTINGS FOR SMALLARMS OR ORDNANCE). As a Foreign Corporation, Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 41.5/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 9 grants, compared with 3 in the 2015–2019 window, a +200% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd.'s 18.3 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 9 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

How does Israel compare?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Israel holds 12 patents, placing it at rank #22,772 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Israel's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

42 Top 33% higher than 67% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 201620172018202020212022202320242025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 1 8.3%
2017 1 8.3%
2018 1 8.3%
2020 1 8.3%
2021 2 16.7%
2022 1 8.3%
2023 2 16.7%
2024 2 16.7%
2025 1 8.3%

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Standard
Velocity Accelerating

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#22,772

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

41.5 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd. hold?
Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd. holds 12 US granted patents filed between 2016 and 2025, spanning 9 technology areas.
What is Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd.'s Innovation Score?
Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 41.5 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd. focus on?
Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd.'s top technology area is F41A (FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OR DETAILS COMMON TO BOTH SMALLARMS AND ORDNANCE, e.g. CANNONS; MOUNTINGS FOR SMALLARMS OR ORDNANCE) with 10 patents. The company has filed patents in 9 CPC subclasses total.
Is Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd.'s recent filing velocity is +200% compared to the prior five-year period. This indicates accelerating innovation.
What does claim depth mean for Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd.'s patents?
Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd.'s patents average 18.3 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the Israel Weapon Industries (i.w.i) Ltd. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

Guides to patent portfolio analysis

How to use this portfolio

Israel's 12 grants land it in the top 33% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Israel ranks #22,772 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in F41A - see who else leads that technology area. F41A leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Explore the patent dataset

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.