inTEST Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01R (Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, intest ranks #41,004 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #41,004
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 33rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.2/100)
- 24.7
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41004 · US Corporation #41,004 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,004/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH inSleep
- CPC-NARROW G01R · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.2/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 24.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: inSleep Technologies, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How intest’s 30.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around intest
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- inTEST · this assignee 30
inTEST · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows intest's Innovation Score is 30.2/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for intest?
Each dot is one of intest’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). intest’s own 24.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where intest's grants concentrate
inTEST Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G01R (Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, intest sits between iOgrapher, LLC and pH Pharma Co., Ltd..
Who files at inTEST's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- iographer
iOgrapher, LLC
6 patents
- irepertoire
iRepertoire, Inc.
6 patents
- ispot tv
iSpot.tv, Inc.
6 patents
- insleep
inSleep Technologies, LLC
6 patents
- iobridge
ioBridge, Inc.
6 patents
- justservice net
justservice.net LLC
6 patents
- noonee
noonee AG
6 patents
- ph Pharma
pH Pharma Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- intest ◀
inTEST Corporation
6 patents
What this shows inTEST holds 6 patents at rank #44,265, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near inTEST
By rank, the assignees closest to #44,265 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in G01R (Measuring Electric Variables)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in inTEST's primary technology class.
- Texas Instruments Incorporated 1,109 in class
- Siemens Healthcare Limited 951 in class
- Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 924 in class
- Infineon Technologies AG 759 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 689 in class
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. 606 in class
- Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG 466 in class
- Robert Bosch GmbH 455 in class
intest's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does inTEST Corporation patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
inTEST Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- inTEST Corporation's lead technology class is G01R (Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01R
- Ranked #41,004 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare inTEST Corporation against iOgrapher, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.