Intercontinental Great Brands LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 229 granted patents across 50 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Intercontinental ranks #1,780 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 229 patents across 50 technology areas.
- #1,780
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 6%
- by Innovation Score (56.7/100)
- 12.1
- avg claims per patent
- -15%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R1780 · US Corporation #1,780 · 229 grants
GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MID 229 grants
- TOP-DECILE #1,780/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH British American…
- CPC-WIDE B65D · 50 areas
- INNOV-PAR 56.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 12.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -15% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Intercontinental’s 56.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Intercontinental
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Hach · near
Hach · near
57 score
- Universite De… · near
Universite De… · near
57 score
- Intercontinental… · this assignee
Intercontinental… · this assignee
57 score
- 1ahead · near
1ahead · near
57 score
- SEB · near
SEB · near
57 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Intercontinental's Innovation Score is 56.7/100 (top 6% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Intercontinental?
Each dot is one of Intercontinental’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Intercontinental’s own 12.1 claims/patent is at or below the 14.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
How Intercontinental's grant cadence moved
Between 2020–2024, Intercontinental Great Brands LLC received 100 grants versus 117 in 2015–2019 (-15% equal-window velocity, above median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2015 at 37 grants and bottomed in 2024 at 12. Lead class B65D accounts for 25.8% of the portfolio across 50 subclasses. Volume neighbours: British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited (#1,776) and tesa SE (#1,784).
Intercontinental's three-year grant acceleration
From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Intercontinental Great Brands LLC moved from 65 to 55 grants (0.85x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #1,670. See the growth leaderboard.
Who files at Intercontinental's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- British American…
British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited
229 patents
- Dai-ichi Seiko
Dai-ichi Seiko Co., Ltd.
229 patents
- Global Graphene G…
Global Graphene Group, Inc.
229 patents
- Hirose Electric
Hirose Electric Co., Ltd.
229 patents
- Siemens Industry…
Siemens Industry Software Ltd.
229 patents
- Sorbonne Universi…
Sorbonne Universite
229 patents
- Universite De Mon…
Universite De Montpellier
229 patents
- tesa SE
tesa SE
229 patents
- Intercontinental… ◀
Intercontinental Great Brands LLC
229 patents
What this shows Intercontinental holds 229 patents at rank #1,780, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Intercontinental
By rank, the assignees closest to #1,780 in granted patent volume.
- British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited #1,776 · 229 patents
- Dai-ichi Seiko Co., Ltd. #1,777 · 229 patents
- Global Graphene Group, Inc. #1,778 · 229 patents
- Hirose Electric Co., Ltd. #1,779 · 229 patents
- Siemens Industry Software Ltd. #1,781 · 229 patents
- Sorbonne Universite #1,782 · 229 patents
- Universite De Montpellier #1,783 · 229 patents
- tesa SE #1,784 · 229 patents
Leaders in B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Intercontinental's primary technology class.
- The Procter & Gamble Company 471 in class
- Graphic Packaging International, LLC 329 in class
- Sonoco Development, Inc. 252 in class
- Altria Client Services LLC 165 in class
- S. C. Johnson & SON, Inc. 162 in class
- Nestec S.A. 150 in class
- Yoshino Kogyosho Co., Ltd. 150 in class
- Toyo Seikan Co., Ltd. 141 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Intercontinental, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials), Intercontinental ranks #36 of 3,365 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (57 here).
Similar claim depth
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (12.1 here).
Intercontinental's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
57 Top 6% higher than 94% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 37 | 16.2% |
| 2016 | 27 | 11.8% |
| 2017 | 19 | 8.3% |
| 2018 | 14 | 6.1% |
| 2019 | 20 | 8.7% |
| 2020 | 22 | 9.6% |
| 2021 | 23 | 10.0% |
| 2022 | 24 | 10.5% |
| 2023 | 19 | 8.3% |
| 2024 | 12 | 5.2% |
| 2025partial year | 12 | 5.2% |
Which technologies does Intercontinental Great Brands LLC patent most?
Top 15 of 50 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Intercontinental Great Brands LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Intercontinental Great Brands LLC's lead technology class is B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F), 25.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65D
- Ranked #1,780 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Intercontinental Great Brands LLC against British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 56.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.