Where does Interactive Strength, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Interactive Strength, Inc. ranks #16,895 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Interactive Strength, Inc. hold?

Interactive Strength, Inc. holds 17 US utility patents granted between 2021 and 2025, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Interactive Strength, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Interactive Strength, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 33.7 out of 100 (45th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Interactive Strength, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Interactive Strength, Inc..

What does claim depth mean for Interactive Strength, Inc.'s patents?

Interactive Strength, Inc.'s patents average 6.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Interactive Strength, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Interactive Strength, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Interactive Strength, Inc. focus on?

Interactive Strength, Inc.'s top technology area is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment) with 7 patents, ranking #192 of 1,021 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Interactive ranks #16,895 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 6 technology areas.

#16,895
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 45th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.7/100): 6.7
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R16895 · US Corporation #16,895 · 17 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 17 grants
MID-PACK #16,895/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Instrumental
CPC-NARROW A63B · 6 areas
INNOV-THIN 33.7/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2021–2025 · 5y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Instrumental, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Interactive’s 33.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.0 pts (30%) Velocity 11.1 pts (33%) Breadth 8.7 pts (26%) Claim depth 4.0 pts (12%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Interactive Strength · this assignee

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Interactive's Innovation Score is 33.7/100 (45th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Interactive?

Each dot is one of Interactive’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Interactive’s own 6.7 claims/patent is at or below the 17.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Interactive vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Interactive's grants concentrate

Interactive Strength, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 41.2% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (10 grants) versus a trough of 6 in 2021. By volume, Interactive sits between Instrumental, Inc. and Intrepid Networks, LLC.

Interactive's three-year grant acceleration

Interactive Strength, Inc. shows 10 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Instrumental

17
Intabio

17
Intellicyt

17
Intelligent Wellh…

17
Interlock USA

17
Intermedia net

17
Interra Systems

17
Intrepid Networks

17
Interactive Stren… ◀

17

What this shows Interactive holds 17 patents at rank #16,899, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Interactive

By rank, the assignees closest to #16,899 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Interactive's primary technology class.

Interactive's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 45th percentile higher than 45% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2021–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Interactive Strength, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2021	6	35.3%
2022	10	58.8%
2025partial year	1	5.9%

Which technologies does Interactive Strength, Inc. patent most?

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 7

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 6

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 6

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 6

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 6

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 6

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Interactive Strength, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Interactive Strength, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 41.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
Ranked #16,895 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Interactive Strength, Inc. against Instrumental, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 33.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.