PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Inter-university Research Institute Coporation National Institutes OF Natural Sciences

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 37 granted patents across 44 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01S (DEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Inter-university ranks #8,614 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 37 patents across 44 technology areas.

#8,614
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 17%
by Innovation Score (48.0/100)
12.5
avg claims per patent
-41%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R8614 · Foreign Corporation #8,614 · 37 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 37 grants
  • UPPER-Q #8,614/50,000
  • PHOTO-FINISH IBC Pharmaceuticals
  • CPC-WIDE H01S · 44 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 48.0/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 12.5 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -41% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: IBC Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Inter-university

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Inter-university Research Institute Coporation National Institutes OF Natural Sciences stamps GRANTS-SMALL, UPPER-Q, PHOTO-FINISH, CPC-WIDE, INNOV-PAR, CLAIMS-RICH, TYPE-FRNCORP, VEL-DROP, BOOK-FULL. Volume places it #8,614 of 50,000; Innovation Score 48.0/100 sits in the top 17% of the PatentsView-derived corpus. Closest grant-volume peer on this plate is IBC Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (±0 grants).

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Portfolio overview

Inter-university Research Institute Coporation National Institutes OF Natural Sciences has been granted 37 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Inter-university Research Institute Coporation National Institutes OF Natural Sciences at #8,614 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 44 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 12.5 claims per patent with primary concentration in H01S (DEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES). As a Foreign Corporation, Inter-university Research Institute Coporation National Institutes OF Natural Sciences is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Inter-university sits between IBC Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (37 patents, rank #8,608) and Johnson Level & Tool Mfg. Co., Inc. (37 patents, rank #8,616) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 48.0/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 13 grants, compared with 22 in the 2015–2019 window, a -41% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Inter-university Research Institute Coporation National Institutes OF Natural Sciences's 12.5 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 44 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Who files at Inter-university's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Inter-university holds 37 patents at rank #8,612, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Inter-university

By rank, the assignees closest to #8,612 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01S (Devices Using THE Process OF Light Amplification BY Stimu…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Inter-university's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Inter-university, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (48 here).

KEY Foundry Co., Ltd. 48 PIC Corporation 48 TOYO TIRE & Rubber Co., Ltd. 48 European Molecular Biology Laboratory 48

Inter-university's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 2015201620172018201920202022202320242025 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Inter-university Research Institute Coporation National Institutes OF Natural Sciences patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 5 13.5%
2016 4 10.8%
2017 2 5.4%
2018 4 10.8%
2019 7 18.9%
2020 5 13.5%
2022 2 5.4%
2023 2 5.4%
2024 4 10.8%
2025partial year 2 5.4%

Which technologies does Inter-university Research Institute Coporation National Institutes OF Natural Sciences patent most?

Top 15 of 44 technology areas

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#8,614

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

48.0 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?
Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.