Where does Innogel AG rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Innogel AG ranks #35,870 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Innogel AG hold?

Innogel AG holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2021, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Innogel AG's Innovation Score?

Innogel AG has an Innovation Score of 24.3 out of 100 (14th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Innogel AG focus on?

Innogel AG's top technology area is C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds) with 4 patents, ranking #777 of 2,352 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Innogel AG's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Innogel AG's recent grant velocity is -83% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Innogel AG's patents?

Innogel AG's patents average 12.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Innogel AG patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Innogel AG

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Innogel ranks #35,870 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 7 technology areas.

#35,870
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 14th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.3/100): 12.9
avg claims per patent: -83%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R35870 · Foreign Corporation #35,870 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #35,870/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Ineos Automotive
CPC-NARROW C08L · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 24.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.9 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -83% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ineos Automotive Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Innogel’s 24.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (30%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 9.4 pts (39%) Claim depth 7.7 pts (32%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Innogel · this assignee

24
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Innogel's Innovation Score is 24.3/100 (14th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Innogel?

Each dot is one of Innogel’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Innogel’s own 12.9 claims/patent is at or below the 13.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Innogel vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Innogel's grants concentrate

Innogel AG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 57.1% of grants classified under C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Innogel sits between Ineos Automotive Limited and Innovative Pressure Testing, LLC.

Ineos Automotive

7
Infrastructure Pr…

7
Inner Mongolia Ki…

7
Innodep

7
Innopeak Technolo…

7
Innovation Thru E…

7
Innovations FOR W…

7
Innovative Pressu…

7
Innogel ◀

7

What this shows Innogel holds 7 patents at rank #35,821, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Innogel

By rank, the assignees closest to #35,821 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Innogel's primary technology class.

Innogel's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 14th percentile higher than 14% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Innogel AG patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	14.3%
2016	4	57.1%
2017	1	14.3%
2021	1	14.3%

Which technologies does Innogel AG patent most?

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 4

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 3

B29K - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses B29b, B29c OR B29d, Relating TO Moulding Materials OR TO Materials FOR ; Moulds, ; Reinforcements, Fillers OR Preformed Parts, e.g. Inserts 3

A61J - Containers Specially Adapted FOR Medical OR Pharmaceutical PURPOSES; Devices OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Bringing Pharmaceutical Products Into Particular Physical OR Administering FORMS; Devices FOR Administering Food OR Medicines ORALLY; Baby COMFORTERS; Devices FOR Receiving Spittle 3

A61K - Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes 3

D21H - Pulp COMPOSITIONS; Preparation Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclasses D21c OR D21D; Impregnating OR Coating OF PAPER; Treatment OF Finished Paper NOT Covered BY Class B31 OR Subclass D21G; Paper NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

A23G - COCOA; Cocoa Products, e.g. CHOCOLATE; Substitutes FOR Cocoa OR Cocoa PRODUCTS; CONFECTIONERY; Chewing GUM; ICE-CREAM; Preparation Thereof 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Innogel AG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Innogel AG's lead technology class is C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds), 57.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C08L
Ranked #35,870 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Innogel AG against Ineos Automotive Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 24.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.