USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

IMO Holding GMBH

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 24 granted patents across 23 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, IMO ranks #12,486 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 24 patents across 23 technology areas.

#12,486
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 30%
by Innovation Score (42.5/100)
20.4
avg claims per patent
-86%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R12486 · Foreign Corporation #12,486 · 24 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 24 grants
  • UPPER-Q #12,486/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Hyland Switzerland…
  • CPC-FOCUS F16C · 23 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 42.5/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 20.4 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -86% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Hyland Switzerland Sarl (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How IMO’s 42.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around IMO

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows IMO's Innovation Score is 42.5/100 (top 30% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for IMO?

Each dot is one of IMO’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). IMO’s own 20.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

IMO vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 23.923.92424.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Hyland Switzerland Sarl - 24, 17.79Hyland Switzerlan…IB Appliances US Holdings, LLC - 24, 5.71IB Appliances US…ID Quantique SA - 24, 12.54ID QuantiqueIljin Co., Ltd. - 24, 12.83IljinIndian Institute OF Technology Kanpur - 24, 19.17Indian Institute…Industrias Alen, S.A. de C.V. - 24, 1Industrias Alen d…Intelligent Intellectual Property Holdings 2 LLC - 24, 21.17Intelligent Intel…Intermec, Inc. - 24, 19.79IntermecIMO Holding GMBH - 24, 20.42IMO Holding
IMO vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where IMO's grants concentrate

IMO Holding GMBH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 23 CPC subclasses with 87.5% of grants classified under F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, IMO sits between Hyland Switzerland Sarl and Intermec, Inc..

IMO's three-year grant acceleration

IMO Holding GMBH shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at IMO's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows IMO holds 24 patents at rank #12,485, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near IMO

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,485 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16C (Shafts)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in IMO's primary technology class.

IMO's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

43 Top 30% higher than 70% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0246810 20152016201720182019202020212022 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
IMO Holding GMBH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 4 16.7%
2016 9 37.5%
2017 3 12.5%
2018 4 16.7%
2019 1 4.2%
2020 1 4.2%
2021 1 4.2%
2022 1 4.2%

Which technologies does IMO Holding GMBH patent most?

Top 15 of 23 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

IMO Holding GMBH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • IMO Holding GMBH's lead technology class is F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings), 87.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16C
  • Ranked #12,486 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare IMO Holding GMBH against Hyland Switzerland Sarl, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 42.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.