Overall rank by patents
#35,798
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 11 technology areas, active 2016–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B29C (SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING).
The verdict
ILC holds 7 US patents across 11 technology areas, rank #35,798 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
ILC Dover Lp has been granted 7 US utility patents between 2016 and 2024, placing ILC Dover Lp at rank #35,798 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 11 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in B29C (SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING). As a US Corporation, ILC Dover Lp is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, ILC sits between Ignis Development Inc. (7 patents, rank #35,794) and IMEC USA Nanoelectronics Design Center, Inc. (7 patents, rank #35,802) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 36.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 3 grants, compared with 4 in the 2015–2019 window, a -25% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. ILC Dover Lp's 17.9 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 11 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark ILC Dover Lp against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
IGNIS DEVELOPMENT INC.
7 patents
IHARA CHEMICAL INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
7 patents
IHC Engineering Business Limited
7 patents
ILC Dover IP, Inc.
7 patents
IMAGE INSIGHT, INC.
7 patents
IMAGILIN TECHNOLOGY, LLC
7 patents
IMASCAP SAS
7 patents
IMEC USA NANOELECTRONICS DESIGN CENTER, Inc.
7 patents
ILC Dover LP
7 patents
What this shows ILC holds 7 patents at rank #35,798, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,798 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in ILC's primary technology class.
ILC's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
36 Top 47% higher than 53% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#35,798
Across all tracked assignees
36.3 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
ILC's 7 grants land it in the top 47% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.