USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

IHC Engineering Business Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, IHC ranks #35,816 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 8 technology areas.

#35,816
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
23rd percentile
by Innovation Score (27.3/100)
16.9
avg claims per patent
-83%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R35816 · Foreign Corporation #35,816 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
  • MID-PACK #35,816/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH IFO R L
  • CPC-NARROW E02F · 8 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 27.3/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 16.9 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -83% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: IFO S.A.R.L. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How IHC’s 27.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around IHC

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows IHC's Innovation Score is 27.3/100 (23rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for IHC?

Each dot is one of IHC’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). IHC’s own 16.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

IHC vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 6.97.07.077.07.07.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent IFO S.A.R.L. - 7, 1IFO R LIfwizard Coprporation - 7, 11.43Ifwizard Coprpora…Ignis Development Inc. - 7, 3.43Ignis DevelopmentIhara Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. - 7, 14.43Ihara Chemical In…ILC Dover IP, Inc. - 7, 14.86ILC Dover IPILC Dover LP - 7, 17.86ILC DoverImage Insight, Inc. - 7, 20.29Image InsightImagilin Technology, LLC - 7, 11.14Imagilin Technolo…IHC Engineering Business Limited - 7, 16.86IHC Engineering B…
IHC vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where IHC's grants concentrate

IHC Engineering Business Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, IHC sits between IFO S.A.R.L. and Imagilin Technology, LLC.

Who files at IHC's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows IHC holds 7 patents at rank #35,796, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near IHC

By rank, the assignees closest to #35,796 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E02F (Dredging)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in IHC's primary technology class.

IHC's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

27 23rd percentile higher than 23% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 2016201720182020 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
IHC Engineering Business Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 3 42.9%
2017 2 28.6%
2018 1 14.3%
2020 1 14.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

IHC Engineering Business Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • IHC Engineering Business Limited's lead technology class is E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E02F
  • Ranked #35,816 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare IHC Engineering Business Limited against IFO S.A.R.L., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 27.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.