IHC Engineering Business Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, IHC ranks #35,816 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #35,816
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 23rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.3/100)
- 16.9
- avg claims per patent
- -83%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35816 · Foreign Corporation #35,816 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,816/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH IFO R L
- CPC-NARROW E02F · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -83% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: IFO S.A.R.L. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How IHC’s 27.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around IHC
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- IHC Engineering… · this assignee 27
IHC Engineering… · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows IHC's Innovation Score is 27.3/100 (23rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for IHC?
Each dot is one of IHC’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). IHC’s own 16.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where IHC's grants concentrate
IHC Engineering Business Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, IHC sits between IFO S.A.R.L. and Imagilin Technology, LLC.
Who files at IHC's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- IFO R L
IFO S.A.R.L.
7 patents
- Ifwizard Coprpora…
Ifwizard Coprporation
7 patents
- Ignis Development
Ignis Development Inc.
7 patents
- Ihara Chemical In…
Ihara Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- ILC Dover IP
ILC Dover IP, Inc.
7 patents
- ILC Dover
ILC Dover LP
7 patents
- Image Insight
Image Insight, Inc.
7 patents
- Imagilin Technolo…
Imagilin Technology, LLC
7 patents
- IHC Engineering B… ◀
IHC Engineering Business Limited
7 patents
What this shows IHC holds 7 patents at rank #35,796, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near IHC
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,796 in granted patent volume.
- IFO S.A.R.L. #35,792 · 7 patents
- Ifwizard Coprporation #35,793 · 7 patents
- Ignis Development Inc. #35,794 · 7 patents
- Ihara Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. #35,795 · 7 patents
- ILC Dover IP, Inc. #35,797 · 7 patents
- ILC Dover LP #35,798 · 7 patents
- Image Insight, Inc. #35,799 · 7 patents
- Imagilin Technology, LLC #35,800 · 7 patents
Leaders in E02F (Dredging)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in IHC's primary technology class.
- Caterpillar Inc. 1,041 in class
- Komatsu Ltd. 910 in class
- Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. 595 in class
- Deere & Company 487 in class
- Kubota Corporation 320 in class
- Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd 250 in class
- Volvo Construction Equipment AB 198 in class
- CNH Industrial America LLC 178 in class
IHC's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 23rd percentile higher than 23% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2017 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does IHC Engineering Business Limited patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
IHC Engineering Business Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- IHC Engineering Business Limited's lead technology class is E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E02F
- Ranked #35,816 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare IHC Engineering Business Limited against IFO S.A.R.L., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.