Overall rank by patents
#40,799
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 7 technology areas, active 2020–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: E04B (GENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS; WALLS, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; INSULATION OR OTHER PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS).
The verdict
Hyperframe holds 6 US patents across 7 technology areas, rank #40,799 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Hyperframe, Inc. has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2020 and 2025, placing Hyperframe, Inc. at rank #40,799 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 7 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.5 claims per patent with primary concentration in E04B (GENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS; WALLS, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; INSULATION OR OTHER PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS). As a US Corporation, Hyperframe, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Hyperframe sits between Hyosung Chemical Corporation (6 patents, rank #40,795) and Hysolate Ltd. (6 patents, rank #40,803) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 36.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2020 through 2025, with 6 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Hyperframe, Inc.'s 17.5 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 7 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Hyperframe, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Hyosung Chemical Corporation
6 patents
Hyosung TNC Corporation
6 patents
HyperAccel Co., Ltd.
6 patents
HyperBranch Medical Technology, Inc.
6 patents
Hyperspectral Corp.
6 patents
Hyphen Technologies, Inc.
6 patents
Hypnap LLC
6 patents
Hysolate Ltd.
6 patents
Hyperframe, Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Hyperframe holds 6 patents at rank #40,799, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #40,799 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Hyperframe's primary technology class.
Hyperframe's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 46% higher than 54% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2025 | 1 | 16.7% |
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#40,799
Across all tracked assignees
36.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Hyperframe's 6 grants land it in the top 46% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.