USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Homag GmbH

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 33 granted patents across 47 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B27D (Working Veneer OR Plywood).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Homag ranks #9,517 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 33 patents across 47 technology areas.

#9,517
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 18%
by Innovation Score (47.7/100)
13.2
avg claims per patent
+800%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R9517 · Foreign Corporation #9,517 · 33 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 33 grants
  • UPPER-Q #9,517/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH HashiCorp
  • CPC-WIDE B27D · 47 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 47.7/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 13.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-SURGE +800% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: HashiCorp (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Homag’s 47.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Homag

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Homag's Innovation Score is 47.7/100 (top 18% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Homag?

Each dot is one of Homag’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Homag’s own 13.2 claims/patent is at or below the 16.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Homag vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 32.933.033.03333.033.033.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Haver & Boecker OHG - 33, 17Haver & Boecker O…HD Hyundai Infracore Co., Ltd. - 33, 11.09HD Hyundai Infrac…Hetero Research Foundation - 33, 7.76Hetero Research F…High SEC Labs Ltd. - 33, 24High SEC LabsHoshino Gakki Co., Ltd. - 33, 7.12Hoshino GakkiHyundai America Technical Center Inc. - 33, 16.33Hyundai America T…HashiCorp - 33, 18.33HashicorpHefei Core Storage Electronic Limited - 33, 18.09Hefei Core StorageHomag GmbH - 33, 13.24Homag
Homag vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Homag's grants concentrate

Homag GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 47 CPC subclasses with 39.4% of grants classified under B27D (Working Veneer OR Plywood). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (10 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2023. By volume, Homag sits between Haver & Boecker OHG and Hefei Core Storage Electronic Limited.

Homag's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Homag GmbH moved from 20 to 10 grants (0.50x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Who files at Homag's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Homag holds 33 patents at rank #9,515, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Homag

By rank, the assignees closest to #9,515 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B27D (Working Veneer OR Plywood)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Homag's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Homag, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B27D (Working Veneer OR Plywood), Homag ranks #1 of 33 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Homag's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

48 Top 18% higher than 82% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

024681012 2019202020212022202320242025 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Homag GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2019 3 9.1%
2020 10 30.3%
2021 7 21.2%
2022 5 15.2%
2023 2 6.1%
2024 3 9.1%
2025partial year 3 9.1%

Which technologies does Homag GmbH patent most?

Top 15 of 47 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Homag GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Homag GmbH's lead technology class is B27D (Working Veneer OR Plywood), 39.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B27D
  • Ranked #9,517 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Homag GmbH against Haver & Boecker OHG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 47.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.