Where does Haver & Boecker OHG rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Haver & Boecker OHG ranks #9,512 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Haver & Boecker OHG hold?

Haver & Boecker OHG holds 33 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 18 technology areas.

What is Haver & Boecker OHG's Innovation Score?

Haver & Boecker OHG has an Innovation Score of 49.6 out of 100 (top 14% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Haver & Boecker OHG focus on?

Haver & Boecker OHG's top technology area is B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking) with 30 patents, ranking #34 of 1,343 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 18 CPC subclasses total.

Is Haver & Boecker OHG's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Haver & Boecker OHG's recent grant velocity is +45% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Haver & Boecker OHG's patents?

Haver & Boecker OHG's patents average 17.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Haver & Boecker OHG patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Haver & Boecker OHG

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 33 granted patents across 18 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Haver ranks #9,512 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 33 patents across 18 technology areas.

#9,512
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 14%
by Innovation Score (49.6/100): 17.0
avg claims per patent: +45%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R9512 · Foreign Corporation #9,512 · 33 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 33 grants
UPPER-Q #9,512/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Guangdong Sirui…
CPC-FOCUS B65B · 18 areas
INNOV-PAR 49.6/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-UP +45% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Guangdong Sirui Optical Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Haver’s 49.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 12.2 pts (25%) Velocity 12.2 pts (25%) Breadth 15.0 pts (30%) Claim depth 10.2 pts (21%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Shenzhen BYD Auto R&D · near

50
D&M Holdings · near

50
Eckart · near

50
Haver & Boecker OHG · this assignee

50
Nexa3D · near

50
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Haver's Innovation Score is 49.6/100 (top 14% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Haver?

Each dot is one of Haver’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Haver’s own 17.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Haver vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Haver's grants concentrate

Haver & Boecker OHG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 18 CPC subclasses with 90.9% of grants classified under B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Haver sits between Guangdong Sirui Optical Co., Ltd. and Homag GmbH.

Haver's three-year grant acceleration

Haver & Boecker OHG shows 11 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Guangdong Sirui O…

33
Guangzhou Shiyuan

33
Gunderson

33
Hanrim Postech

33
HD Hyundai Infrac…

33
Hetero Research F…

33
High SEC Labs

33
Homag

33
Haver & Boecker O… ◀

33

What this shows Haver holds 33 patents at rank #9,511, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Haver

By rank, the assignees closest to #9,511 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B65B (Machines)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Haver's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Haver, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B65B (Machines), Haver ranks #34 of 1,343 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (50 here).

Nexa3D Inc. 50 Eckart GmbH 50 D&M Holdings Inc. 50 Shenzhen BYD Auto R&D Company Limited 50

Haver's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 14% higher than 86% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Haver & Boecker OHG patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	6.1%
2016	3	9.1%
2017	4	12.1%
2018	1	3.0%
2019	1	3.0%
2020	4	12.1%
2021	1	3.0%
2022	3	9.1%
2023	3	9.1%
2024	5	15.2%
2025partial year	6	18.2%

Which technologies does Haver & Boecker OHG patent most?

B65B - Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking 30

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 2

B65D - Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR Fittings THEREFOR; Packaging ELEMENTS; Packages 2

G01G - Weighing 2

B31B - Making Containers OF Paper, Cardboard OR Material Worked IN A Manner Analogous TO Paper 2

B08B - Cleaning IN GENERAL; Prevention OF Fouling IN General 2

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 1

D06N - Wall, Floor, OR Like Covering Materials, e.g. Linoleum, Oilcloth, Artificial Leather, Roofing Felt, Consisting OF A Fibrous WEB Coated With A Layer OF Macromolecular MATERIAL; Flexible Sheet Material NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

C09J - ADHESIVES; Non-mechanical Aspects OF Adhesive Processes IN GENERAL; Adhesive Processes NOT Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF Materials AS Adhesives 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

D03D - Woven FABRICS; Methods OF WEAVING; Looms 1

D10B - Indexing Scheme Associated With Sublasses OF Section D, Relating TO Textiles 1

B65G - Transport OR Storage Devices, e.g. Conveyors FOR Loading OR Tipping, Shop Conveyor Systems OR Pneumatic Tube Conveyors 1

B02C - Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain 1

B07B - Separating Solids From Solids BY Sieving, Screening, Sifting OR BY Using GAS CURRENTS; Separating BY Other DRY Methods Applicable TO Bulk Material, e.g. Loose Articles FIT TO BE Handled Like Bulk Material 1

Top 15 of 18 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Haver & Boecker OHG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Haver & Boecker OHG's lead technology class is B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking), 90.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65B
Ranked #9,512 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Haver & Boecker OHG against Guangdong Sirui Optical Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 49.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.