PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Hm.clause, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 101 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A01H (NEW PLANTS OR ; NON-TRANSGENIC; PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
101
Total patents granted
4
CPC technology areas
24.4
Avg claims per patent
+46%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Hm.clause holds 101 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #3,627 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#3,627
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 23%
by Innovation Score (45.4/100)
24.4
avg claims per patent
+46%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Hm.clause, Inc. has been granted 101 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Hm.clause, Inc. at rank #3,627 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 24.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in A01H (NEW PLANTS OR ; NON-TRANSGENIC; PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES). As a US Corporation, Hm.clause, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Hm.clause sits between Curna, Inc. (101 patents, rank #3,623) and Nanolumens Acquisition, Inc. (101 patents, rank #3,631) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 45.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 60 grants, compared with 41 in the 2015–2019 window, a +46% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Hm.clause, Inc.'s 24.4 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Hm.clause, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Hmclause's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Hm.clause holds 101 patents at rank #3,627, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Hmclause

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,627 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A01H (NEW Plants OR)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Hmclause's primary technology class.

Hm.clause's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

45 Top 23% higher than 77% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

05101520 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 7
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Hm.clause, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 1.0%
2016 5 5.0%
2017 6 5.9%
2018 13 12.9%
2019 16 15.8%
2020 8 7.9%
2021 8 7.9%
2022 14 13.9%
2023 10 9.9%
2024 13 12.9%
2025 7 6.9%

Which technologies does Hm.clause, Inc. patent most?

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Moderate
Tech Breadth Specialized
Claim Depth Complex
Velocity Growing

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#3,627

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

45.4 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Hm.clause, Inc. hold?
Hm.clause, Inc. holds 101 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2025, spanning 4 technology areas.
What is Hm.clause, Inc.'s Innovation Score?
Hm.clause, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 45.4 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Hm.clause, Inc. focus on?
Hm.clause, Inc.'s top technology area is A01H (NEW PLANTS OR ; NON-TRANSGENIC; PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES) with 101 patents. The company has filed patents in 4 CPC subclasses total.
Is Hm.clause, Inc.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Hm.clause, Inc.'s recent filing velocity is +46% compared to the prior five-year period. The company is maintaining or growing its patent output.
What does claim depth mean for Hm.clause, Inc.'s patents?
Hm.clause, Inc.'s patents average 24.4 claims each. This indicates complex, broadly scoped patents that are harder for competitors to design around.
How is the Hm.clause, Inc. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Hm.clause's 101 grants land it in the top 23% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Hm.clause ranks #3,627 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in A01H - see who else leads that technology area. A01H leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.