HarvestMoore, L.L.C.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01D (HARVESTING; Mowing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Harvestmoore ranks #35,649 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 10 technology areas.
- #35,649
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 40th percentile
- by Innovation Score (32.2/100)
- 20.3
- avg claims per patent
- +33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35649 · US Corporation #35,649 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,649/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Harry Miller
- CPC-FOCUS A01D · 10 areas
- INNOV-THIN 32.2/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-UP +33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Harry Miller Co., LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Harvestmoore’s 32.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Harvestmoore
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- HarvestMoore L L C · this assignee 32
HarvestMoore L L C · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Harvestmoore's Innovation Score is 32.2/100 (40th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Harvestmoore?
Each dot is one of Harvestmoore’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Harvestmoore’s own 20.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Harvestmoore's grants concentrate
HarvestMoore, L.L.C. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under A01D (HARVESTING; Mowing). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Harvestmoore sits between Harry Miller Co., LLC and Health Catalysts Inc..
Harvestmoore's three-year grant acceleration
HarvestMoore, L.L.C. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at HarvestMoore's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Harry Miller
Harry Miller Co., LLC
7 patents
- Hartman Design
Hartman Design, Inc.
7 patents
- Harvest Tec
Harvest Tec, Inc.
7 patents
- Harvest
Harvest Technologies Corporation
7 patents
- Hauff-technik & KG
Hauff-Technik GmbH & Co. KG
7 patents
- Hawaii Biotech
Hawaii Biotech Inc.
7 patents
- Health Bloom
Health Bloom, LLC
7 patents
- Health Catalysts
Health Catalysts Inc.
7 patents
- Harvestmoore L L C ◀
HarvestMoore, L.L.C.
7 patents
What this shows HarvestMoore holds 7 patents at rank #35,709, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near HarvestMoore
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,709 in granted patent volume.
- Harry Miller Co., LLC #35,705 · 7 patents
- Hartman Design, Inc. #35,706 · 7 patents
- Harvest Tec, Inc. #35,707 · 7 patents
- Harvest Technologies Corporation #35,708 · 7 patents
- Hauff-Technik GmbH & Co. KG #35,710 · 7 patents
- Hawaii Biotech Inc. #35,711 · 7 patents
- Health Bloom, LLC #35,712 · 7 patents
- Health Catalysts Inc. #35,713 · 7 patents
Leaders in A01D (Harvesting)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in HarvestMoore's primary technology class.
Harvestmoore's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 40th percentile higher than 40% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2021 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does HarvestMoore, L.L.C. patent most?
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
HarvestMoore, L.L.C.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- HarvestMoore, L.L.C.'s lead technology class is A01D (HARVESTING; Mowing), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01D
- Ranked #35,649 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare HarvestMoore, L.L.C. against Harry Miller Co., LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 32.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.