Overall rank by patents
#47,310
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2017–2018. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F04C (ROTARY-PISTON, OR OSCILLATING-PISTON, POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS ; ROTARY-PISTON, OR OSCILLATING-PISTON, POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS).
The verdict
Hansen holds 5 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #47,310 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Hansen Engine Corporation has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2017 and 2018, placing Hansen Engine Corporation at rank #47,310 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 21.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in F04C (ROTARY-PISTON, OR OSCILLATING-PISTON, POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS ; ROTARY-PISTON, OR OSCILLATING-PISTON, POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS). As a US Corporation, Hansen Engine Corporation is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Hansen sits between Hangzhou Xinglu Technology Co., Ltd. (5 patents, rank #47,306) and Harrison Legacy 301, Llc (5 patents, rank #47,314) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 26.0/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Hansen Engine Corporation's 21.2 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Hansen Engine Corporation against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
HANGZHOU XINGLU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
5 patents
HANITA LENSES LTD.
5 patents
HANKUK UNIVERSITY OF FOREIGN STUDIES RESEARCH & BUSINESS FOUNDATION
5 patents
HANLIM PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
5 patents
HARADA ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
5 patents
HARDA INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
5 patents
HARMON.IE R&D LTD.
5 patents
HARRISON LEGACY 301, LLC
5 patents
HANSEN ENGINE CORPORATION
5 patents
What this shows Hansen holds 5 patents at rank #47,310, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #47,310 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Hansen's primary technology class.
Hansen's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 Top 81% higher than 19% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 3 | 60.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 40.0% |
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#47,310
Across all tracked assignees
26.0 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Hansen's 5 grants land it in the top 81% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.