Overall rank by patents
#47,314
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 6 technology areas, active 2018–2021. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61H (PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFI).
The verdict
Harrison holds 5 US patents across 6 technology areas, rank #47,314 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Harrison Legacy 301, Llc has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2018 and 2021, placing Harrison Legacy 301, Llc at rank #47,314 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 6 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 14.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61H (PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFI). As a US Corporation, Harrison Legacy 301, Llc is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Harrison sits between Hansen Engine Corporation (5 patents, rank #47,310) and Havco WOOD Products, Llc (5 patents, rank #47,318) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 23.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 1 grants, compared with 4 in the 2015–2019 window, a -75% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Harrison Legacy 301, Llc's 14.0 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 6 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Harrison Legacy 301, Llc against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
HANSEN ENGINE CORPORATION
5 patents
HARADA ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
5 patents
HARDA INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
5 patents
HARMON.IE R&D LTD.
5 patents
HARTING AG
5 patents
HARTING Automotive GmbH
5 patents
HARVEST THERMAL, INC.
5 patents
HAVCO WOOD PRODUCTS, LLC
5 patents
HARRISON LEGACY 301, LLC
5 patents
What this shows Harrison holds 5 patents at rank #47,314, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #47,314 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Harrison's primary technology class.
Harrison's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 Top 88% higher than 12% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#47,314
Across all tracked assignees
23.3 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Harrison's 5 grants land it in the top 88% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.