USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

H R D Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 27 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01F (Mixing, e.g. Dissolving, Emulsifying OR Dispersing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, H ranks #16,067 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 27 technology areas.

#16,067
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 40%
by Innovation Score (38.5/100)
16.7
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R16067 · US Corporation #16,067 · 18 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
  • MID-PACK #16,067/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Grand Rapids Chair
  • CPC-FOCUS B01F · 27 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 38.5/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 16.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Grand Rapids Chair Company (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How H’s 38.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around H

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows H's Innovation Score is 38.5/100 (top 40% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for H?

Each dot is one of H’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). H’s own 16.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

H vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 17.917.91818.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Grand Rapids Chair Company - 18, 2.28Grand Rapids ChairGuangzhou Mibo Zhilian Technology Co. Ltd - 18, 1.22Guangzhou Mibo Zh…Guardtime IP Holdings Limited - 18, 22.56Guardtime IP Hold…Guoguang Electric Company Limited - 18, 20.44Guoguang ElectricH4 Engineering, Inc. - 18, 10.89H4 EngineeringHaptech, Inc. - 18, 19.56HaptechHbpo GmbH - 18, 16.39HbpoHDT Expeditionary Systems, Inc. - 18, 16HDT Expeditionary…H R D Corporation - 18, 16.67H R D
H vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where H's grants concentrate

H R D Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 27 CPC subclasses with 72.2% of grants classified under B01F (Mixing, e.g. Dissolving, Emulsifying OR Dispersing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (10 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2018. By volume, H sits between Grand Rapids Chair Company and HDT Expeditionary Systems, Inc..

Who files at H's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows H holds 18 patents at rank #16,066, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near H

By rank, the assignees closest to #16,066 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B01F (Mixing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in H's primary technology class.

H's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

39 Top 40% higher than 60% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

024681012 2015201620172018 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
H R D Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 10 55.6%
2016 3 16.7%
2017 3 16.7%
2018 2 11.1%

Which technologies does H R D Corporation patent most?

Top 15 of 27 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

H R D Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • H R D Corporation's lead technology class is B01F (Mixing, e.g. Dissolving, Emulsifying OR Dispersing), 72.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B01F
  • Ranked #16,067 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare H R D Corporation against Grand Rapids Chair Company, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 38.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.