Where does Green Swan, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Green Swan, Inc. ranks #31,818 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Green Swan, Inc. hold?

Green Swan, Inc. holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2018, spanning 9 technology areas.

What is Green Swan, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Green Swan, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 24.9 out of 100 (16th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Green Swan, Inc. focus on?

Green Swan, Inc.'s top technology area is H04B (Transmission) with 6 patents, ranking #1,151 of 3,909 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 9 CPC subclasses total.

Is Green Swan, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Green Swan, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Green Swan, Inc.'s patents?

Green Swan, Inc.'s patents average 11.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Green Swan, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Green Swan, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04B (Transmission).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Green ranks #31,818 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 9 technology areas.

#31,818
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 16th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.9/100): 11.3
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R31818 · US Corporation #31,818 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #31,818/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Great Circle
CPC-NARROW H04B · 9 areas
INNOV-THIN 24.9/100
CLAIMS-PAR 11.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Great Circle Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Green’s 24.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (30%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 10.6 pts (42%) Claim depth 6.8 pts (27%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Green Swan · this assignee

25
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Green's Innovation Score is 24.9/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Green?

Each dot is one of Green’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Green’s own 11.3 claims/patent is at or below the 15.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Green vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Green's grants concentrate

Green Swan, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under H04B (Transmission). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Green sits between Great Circle Technologies, Inc. and Guangdong Global Egrow (Zhaoqing) Cross-Border E-Commerce Co., Ltd..

Great Circle

8
Great Plains Indu…

8
Green Manufacturi…

8
Green Source Hold…

8
Greentec-usa

8
Greenlight Innova…

8
Grid ai

8
Guangdong Global…

8
Green Swan ◀

8

What this shows Green holds 8 patents at rank #31,836, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Green

By rank, the assignees closest to #31,836 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04B (Transmission)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Green's primary technology class.

Green's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Green Swan, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	37.5%
2016	1	12.5%
2017	3	37.5%
2018	1	12.5%

Which technologies does Green Swan, Inc. patent most?

H04B - Transmission 6

H04M - Telephonic Communication 5

H01Q - Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials 2

G21F - Protection Against X-radiation, Gamma Radiation, Corpuscular Radiation OR Particle BOMBARDMENT; Treating Radioactively Contaminated MATERIAL; Decontamination Arrangements Therefor 1

H01L - Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10 1

G10K - Sound-producing DEVICES; Methods OR Devices FOR Protecting Against, OR FOR Damping, Noise OR Other Acoustic Waves IN GENERAL; Acoustics NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

H04K - Secret COMMUNICATION; Jamming OF Communication 1

G01S - Radio DIRECTION-FINDING; Radio NAVIGATION; Determining Distance OR Velocity BY USE OF Radio WAVES; Locating OR Presence-detecting BY USE OF THE Reflection OR Reradiation OF Radio WAVES; Analogous Arrangements Using Other Waves 1

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 1

Top 9 of 9 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Green Swan, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Green Swan, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04B (Transmission), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04B
Ranked #31,818 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Green Swan, Inc. against Great Circle Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 24.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.