Great Circle Technologies, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Great ranks #31,813 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #31,813
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 25th percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.8/100)
- 18.1
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R31813 · US Corporation #31,813 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #31,813/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Grad ApS
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Grad ApS (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Great’s 27.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Great
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Great Circle · this assignee 28
Great Circle · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Great's Innovation Score is 27.8/100 (25th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Great?
Each dot is one of Great’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Great’s own 18.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Great's grants concentrate
Great Circle Technologies, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2017. By volume, Great sits between Grad ApS and Green Swan, Inc..
Who files at Great's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Grad Aps
Grad ApS
8 patents
- Graham Engineering
Graham Engineering Company, LLC
8 patents
- Gray Research
Gray Research LLC
8 patents
- Graymont (PA)
Graymont (PA) Inc.
8 patents
- Great Plains Indu…
Great Plains Industries, Inc.
8 patents
- Green Manufacturi…
Green Manufacturing, Inc.
8 patents
- Green Source Hold…
Green Source Holdings LLC
8 patents
- Green Swan
Green Swan, Inc.
8 patents
- Great Circle ◀
Great Circle Technologies, Inc.
8 patents
What this shows Great holds 8 patents at rank #31,832, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Great
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,832 in granted patent volume.
- Grad ApS #31,828 · 8 patents
- Graham Engineering Company, LLC #31,829 · 8 patents
- Gray Research LLC #31,830 · 8 patents
- Graymont (PA) Inc. #31,831 · 8 patents
- Great Plains Industries, Inc. #31,833 · 8 patents
- Green Manufacturing, Inc. #31,834 · 8 patents
- Green Source Holdings LLC #31,835 · 8 patents
- Green Swan, Inc. #31,836 · 8 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Great's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Great's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 25th percentile higher than 25% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2020 | 4 | 50.0% |
Which technologies does Great Circle Technologies, Inc. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Great Circle Technologies, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Great Circle Technologies, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #31,813 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Great Circle Technologies, Inc. against Grad ApS, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.