Where does Giamag Technologies AS rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Giamag Technologies AS ranks #47,047 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Giamag Technologies AS hold?

Giamag Technologies AS holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2020, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Giamag Technologies AS's Innovation Score?

Giamag Technologies AS has an Innovation Score of 25.6 out of 100 (18th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Giamag Technologies AS's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Giamag Technologies AS's recent grant velocity is -75% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Giamag Technologies AS's patents?

Giamag Technologies AS's patents average 20.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Giamag Technologies AS patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Giamag Technologies AS

Q: What technology areas does Giamag Technologies AS focus on?

Giamag Technologies AS's top technology area is B03C (Magnetic OR Electrostatic Separation OF Solid Materials From Solid Materials OR FLUIDS; Separation BY High-voltage Electric Fields) with 4 patents, ranking #50 of 253 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B03C (Magnetic OR Electrostatic Separation OF Solid Materials From Solid Materials OR FLUIDS; Separation BY High-voltage Electric Fields).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Giamag ranks #47,047 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.

#47,047
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 18th percentile
by Innovation Score (25.6/100): 20.6
avg claims per patent: -75%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R47047 · Foreign Corporation #47,047 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #47,047/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Gerstel Systemtechni…
CPC-NARROW B03C · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 25.6/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 20.6 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -75% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Gerstel Systemtechnik GmbH & Co. KG (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Giamag’s 25.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (24%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 7.1 pts (28%) Claim depth 12.4 pts (48%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Giamag AS · this assignee

26
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Giamag's Innovation Score is 25.6/100 (18th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Giamag?

Each dot is one of Giamag’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Giamag’s own 20.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Giamag vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Giamag's grants concentrate

Giamag Technologies AS is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under B03C (Magnetic OR Electrostatic Separation OF Solid Materials From Solid Materials OR FLUIDS; Separation BY High-voltage Electric Fields). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Giamag sits between Gerstel Systemtechnik GmbH & Co. KG and GigSky, Inc..

Gerstel Systemtec…

5
Gesea Biosciences

5
Gestamp Umformtec…

5
Getty Images

5
Gibraltar

5
Giesecke+Devrient…

5
Giffin Tec

5
Gigsky

5
Giamag AS ◀

5

What this shows Giamag holds 5 patents at rank #47,173, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Giamag

By rank, the assignees closest to #47,173 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B03C (Magnetic OR Electrostatic Separation OF Solid Materials F…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Giamag's primary technology class.

Giamag's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

26 18th percentile higher than 18% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Giamag Technologies AS patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	20.0%
2018	2	40.0%
2019	1	20.0%
2020	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Giamag Technologies AS patent most?

B03C - Magnetic OR Electrostatic Separation OF Solid Materials From Solid Materials OR FLUIDS; Separation BY High-voltage Electric Fields 4

H01F - MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Magnetic Properties 3

F16C - SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings 3

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 2

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Giamag Technologies AS's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Giamag Technologies AS's lead technology class is B03C (Magnetic OR Electrostatic Separation OF Solid Materials From Solid Materials OR FLUIDS; Separation BY High-voltage Electric Fields), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B03C
Ranked #47,047 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Giamag Technologies AS against Gerstel Systemtechnik GmbH & Co. KG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 25.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.