Where does Full-Swing Golf, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Full-Swing Golf, Inc. ranks #13,994 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Full-Swing Golf, Inc. hold?

Full-Swing Golf, Inc. holds 21 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Full-Swing Golf, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Full-Swing Golf, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 34.0 out of 100 (46th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Full-Swing Golf, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Full-Swing Golf, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Full-Swing Golf, Inc.'s patents?

Full-Swing Golf, Inc.'s patents average 13.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Full-Swing Golf, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Full-Swing Golf, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Full-Swing Golf, Inc. focus on?

Full-Swing Golf, Inc.'s top technology area is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment) with 18 patents, ranking #63 of 1,021 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Full-swing ranks #13,994 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 21 patents across 6 technology areas.

#13,994
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 46th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.0/100): 13.3
avg claims per patent: -33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R13994 · US Corporation #13,994 · 21 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 21 grants
MID-PACK #13,994/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Fortanix
CPC-NARROW A63B · 6 areas
INNOV-THIN 34.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 13.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Fortanix, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Full-swing’s 34.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.7 pts (31%) Velocity 6.7 pts (20%) Breadth 8.7 pts (26%) Claim depth 8.0 pts (23%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Magnacom · near

34
Mips Tech · near

34
Vitronic Dr -Ing… · near

34
Full-Swing Golf · this assignee

34
Lumacyte · near

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Full-swing's Innovation Score is 34.0/100 (46th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Full-swing?

Each dot is one of Full-swing’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Full-swing’s own 13.3 claims/patent is at or below the 15.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Full-swing vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Full-swing's grants concentrate

Full-Swing Golf, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Full-swing sits between Fortanix, Inc. and Genomictree, Inc..

Full-swing's three-year grant acceleration

Full-Swing Golf, Inc. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Fortanix

21
Fortress Cyber Se…

21
Foshan Shunde Hig…

21
Freudenberg Medic…

21
G I Windows

21
Galvion

21
Gatan

21
Genomictree

21
Full-swing Golf ◀

21

What this shows Full-Swing holds 21 patents at rank #13,993, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Full-Swing

By rank, the assignees closest to #13,993 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Full-Swing's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Full-Swing, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training), Full-Swing ranks #63 of 1,021 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (34 here).

Lumacyte, Inc. 34 Vitronic Dr.-Ing. Stein Bildverarbeitungssysteme GmbH 34 Magnacom Ltd. 34 Mips Tech, LLC 34

Full-swing's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 46th percentile higher than 46% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Full-Swing Golf, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	9.5%
2016	1	4.8%
2017	3	14.3%
2018	4	19.0%
2019	2	9.5%
2020	1	4.8%
2021	2	9.5%
2022	2	9.5%
2023	1	4.8%
2024	2	9.5%
2025partial year	1	4.8%

Which technologies does Full-Swing Golf, Inc. patent most?

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 18

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 6

G09B - Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams 4

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 2

G01S - Radio DIRECTION-FINDING; Radio NAVIGATION; Determining Distance OR Velocity BY USE OF Radio WAVES; Locating OR Presence-detecting BY USE OF THE Reflection OR Reradiation OF Radio WAVES; Analogous Arrangements Using Other Waves 2

H01Q - Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials 2

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Full-Swing Golf, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Full-Swing Golf, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
Ranked #13,994 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Full-Swing Golf, Inc. against Fortanix, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 34.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.