Overall rank by patents
#5,837
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 58 granted patents across 7 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A43B (CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR).
The verdict
Fuerst holds 58 US patents across 7 technology areas, rank #5,837 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Fuerst Group, Inc. has been granted 58 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Fuerst Group, Inc. at rank #5,837 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 7 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 6.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in A43B (CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR). As a US Corporation, Fuerst Group, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Fuerst sits between Duquesne University Of The Holy Spirit (58 patents, rank #5,833) and Giant Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (58 patents, rank #5,841) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 31.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 39 grants, compared with 19 in the 2015–2019 window, a +105% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Fuerst Group, Inc.'s 6.0 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 7 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Fuerst Group, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit
58 patents
EM-TECH Co., Ltd
58 patents
EchoStar UK Holdings Limited
58 patents
Engineered Controls International, LLC
58 patents
Flashbay Electronics Hong Kong Limited
58 patents
GE Medical Systems Global Technology Company, LLC
58 patents
GENETEC INC.
58 patents
GIANT MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.
58 patents
FUERST GROUP, INC.
58 patents
What this shows Fuerst holds 58 patents at rank #5,837, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #5,837 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Fuerst's primary technology class.
Fuerst's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 Top 64% higher than 36% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 1.7% |
| 2016 | 1 | 1.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 1.7% |
| 2018 | 6 | 10.3% |
| 2019 | 10 | 17.2% |
| 2020 | 8 | 13.8% |
| 2021 | 10 | 17.2% |
| 2022 | 4 | 6.9% |
| 2023 | 9 | 15.5% |
| 2024 | 4 | 6.9% |
| 2025 | 4 | 6.9% |
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#5,837
Across all tracked assignees
31.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Fuerst's 58 grants land it in the top 64% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.