Earth Renaissance Technologies, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Earth ranks #39,933 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #39,933
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 8th percentile
- by Innovation Score (21.3/100)
- 9.8
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39933 · US Corporation #39,933 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,933/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Earth
- CPC-NARROW C02F · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 21.3/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 9.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Earth Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Earth’s 21.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Earth
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Earth Renaissance · this assignee 21
Earth Renaissance · this assignee
21 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Earth's Innovation Score is 21.3/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Earth?
Each dot is one of Earth’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Earth’s own 9.8 claims/patent is at or below the 9.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Earth's grants concentrate
Earth Renaissance Technologies, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Earth sits between EXP Services Inc. and EcoPower Spark, LLC.
Who files at Earth's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- EXP Services
EXP Services Inc.
6 patents
- Extreme Reality
Extreme Reality Ltd.
6 patents
- Extremity Develop…
Extremity Development Company, LLC
6 patents
- Earth
Earth Corporation
6 patents
- Earthwell
Earthwell, Inc.
6 patents
- Echo Box Audio
Echo Box Audio, LLC
6 patents
- Eckold & KG
Eckold GmbH & Co. KG
6 patents
- Ecopower Spark
EcoPower Spark, LLC
6 patents
- Earth Renaissance ◀
Earth Renaissance Technologies, LLC
6 patents
What this shows Earth holds 6 patents at rank #40,032, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Earth
By rank, the assignees closest to #40,032 in granted patent volume.
- EXP Services Inc. #40,028 · 6 patents
- Extreme Reality Ltd. #40,029 · 6 patents
- Extremity Development Company, LLC #40,030 · 6 patents
- Earth Corporation #40,031 · 6 patents
- Earthwell, Inc. #40,033 · 6 patents
- Echo Box Audio, LLC #40,034 · 6 patents
- Eckold GmbH & Co. KG #40,035 · 6 patents
- EcoPower Spark, LLC #40,036 · 6 patents
Leaders in C02F (Treatment OF Water)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Earth's primary technology class.
- Ecolab USA Inc. 243 in class
- King Fahd University OF Petroleum AND Minerals 188 in class
- Evoqua Water Technologies LLC 177 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 147 in class
- Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies Support 82 in class
- Kurita Water Industries Ltd. 80 in class
- Nanjing University 75 in class
- Kemira OYJ 55 in class
Earth's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 3 | 50.0% |
Which technologies does Earth Renaissance Technologies, LLC patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Earth Renaissance Technologies, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Earth Renaissance Technologies, LLC's lead technology class is C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C02F
- Ranked #39,933 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Earth Renaissance Technologies, LLC against EXP Services Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 21.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.