Overall rank by patents
#2,963
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record — 128 granted patents across 32 technology areas, active 2016–2022. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: E21B (EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS).
The verdict
Evolution holds 128 US patents across 32 technology areas — rank #2,963 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Evolution Engineering Inc. has been granted 128 US utility patents between 2016 and 2022, placing Evolution Engineering Inc. at rank #2,963 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 32 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 25.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in E21B (EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS). As a Foreign Corporation, Evolution Engineering Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 52.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 27 grants, compared with 101 in the 2015–2019 window — a -73% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Evolution Engineering Inc.'s 25.6 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while a multi-domain presence across 32 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Evolution Engineering Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders — this company marked ◀
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
106,890 patents
International Business Machines Corporation
72,926 patents
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
34,378 patents
LG ELECTRONICS INC.
32,607 patents
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD.
31,041 patents
Apple Inc.
30,560 patents
QUALCOMM Incorporated
30,354 patents
Intel Corporation
27,498 patents
Evolution Engineering Inc.
128 patents
What this shows Evolution holds 128 patents — placing it at rank #2,963 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.
Evolution's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
52 Top 10% higher than 90% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView — PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 15 | 11.7% |
| 2017 | 28 | 21.9% |
| 2018 | 29 | 22.7% |
| 2019 | 29 | 22.7% |
| 2020 | 14 | 10.9% |
| 2021 | 9 | 7.0% |
| 2022 | 4 | 3.1% |
Top 15 of 32 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#2,963
Across all tracked assignees
52.3 out of 100
Evolution Engineering Inc.'s primary CPC class — all holders and yearly trends
See where Evolution Engineering Inc. ranks among the largest US patent assignees
Browse every CPC technology area by patent activity
The four dimensions behind the Innovation Score
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.