Where does Evertree rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Evertree ranks #22,550 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Evertree hold?

Evertree holds 12 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2025, spanning 11 technology areas.

What is Evertree's Innovation Score?

Evertree has an Innovation Score of 35.4 out of 100 (top 49% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Evertree focus on?

Evertree's top technology area is C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds) with 12 patents, ranking #332 of 2,352 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 11 CPC subclasses total.

Is Evertree's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Evertree's recent grant velocity is -17% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Evertree's patents?

Evertree's patents average 24.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Evertree patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Evertree

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Evertree ranks #22,550 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 11 technology areas.

#22,550
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 49%
by Innovation Score (35.4/100): 24.8
avg claims per patent: -17%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R22550 · Foreign Corporation #22,550 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
MID-PACK #22,550/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Essex Furukawa…
CPC-FOCUS C08L · 11 areas
INNOV-THIN 35.4/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 24.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DOWN -17% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Essex Furukawa Magnet Wire USA LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Evertree’s 35.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.9 pts (25%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 11.7 pts (33%) Claim depth 14.9 pts (42%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Evertree · this assignee

35
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Evertree's Innovation Score is 35.4/100 (top 49% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Evertree?

Each dot is one of Evertree’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Evertree’s own 24.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Evertree vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Evertree's grants concentrate

Evertree is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Evertree sits between Essex Furukawa Magnet Wire USA LLC and Exordium Engineering LLC.

Essex Furukawa Ma…

12
Ethypharm

12
Eurokera

12
Everest Networks

12
Evoco

12
Evriholder Produc…

12
Excelerate Energy…

12
Exordium Engineer…

12
Evertree ◀

12

What this shows Evertree holds 12 patents at rank #22,551, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Evertree

By rank, the assignees closest to #22,551 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Evertree's primary technology class.

Evertree's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

35 Top 49% higher than 51% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Evertree patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	8.3%
2018	4	33.3%
2019	1	8.3%
2020	2	16.7%
2021	3	25.0%
2025partial year	1	8.3%

Which technologies does Evertree patent most?

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 12

C09J - ADHESIVES; Non-mechanical Aspects OF Adhesive Processes IN GENERAL; Adhesive Processes NOT Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF Materials AS Adhesives 10

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 10

C08H - Derivatives OF Natural Macromolecular Compounds 7

C08G - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds 7

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 5

B27N - Manufacture BY DRY Processes OF Articles, With OR Without Organic Binding Agents, Made From Particles OR Fibres Consisting OF Wood OR Other Lignocellulosic OR Like Organic Material 5

B29B - Preparation OR Pretreatment OF THE Material TO BE SHAPED; Making Granules OR PREFORMS; Recovery OF Plastics OR Other Constituents OF Waste Material Containing Plastics 2

C08J - WORKING-UP; General Processes OF COMPOUNDING; After-treatment NOT Covered BY Subclasses C08b, C08c, C08f, C08g or C08h 2

D21H - Pulp COMPOSITIONS; Preparation Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclasses D21c OR D21D; Impregnating OR Coating OF PAPER; Treatment OF Finished Paper NOT Covered BY Class B31 OR Subclass D21G; Paper NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 2

Top 11 of 11 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Evertree's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Evertree's lead technology class is C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C08L
Ranked #22,550 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Evertree against Essex Furukawa Magnet Wire USA LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 35.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.