EndoStim, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Endostim ranks #15,254 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #15,254
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 35th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.7/100)
- 18.3
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R15254 · US Corporation #15,254 · 19 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
- MID-PACK #15,254/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Elucent Medical
- CPC-NARROW A61N · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Elucent Medical, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Endostim’s 30.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Endostim
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- EndoStim · this assignee 31
EndoStim · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Endostim's Innovation Score is 30.7/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Endostim?
Each dot is one of Endostim’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Endostim’s own 18.3 claims/patent is at or below the 18.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Endostim's grants concentrate
EndoStim, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (7 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2018. By volume, Endostim sits between Elucent Medical, Inc. and Esperion Therapeutics, Inc..
Who files at EndoStim's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Elucent Medical
Elucent Medical, Inc.
19 patents
- Embody
Embody, Inc.
19 patents
- Emerson Vulcan Ho…
Emerson Vulcan Holding LLC
19 patents
- Encodia
Encodia, Inc.
19 patents
- Endochoice Innova…
Endochoice Innovation Center Ltd.
19 patents
- Epic Lift Systems
Epic Lift Systems
19 patents
- Espera-werke
Espera-Werke GmbH
19 patents
- Esperion Therapeu…
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
19 patents
- Endostim ◀
EndoStim, Inc.
19 patents
What this shows EndoStim holds 19 patents at rank #15,256, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near EndoStim
By rank, the assignees closest to #15,256 in granted patent volume.
- Elucent Medical, Inc. #15,252 · 19 patents
- Embody, Inc. #15,253 · 19 patents
- Emerson Vulcan Holding LLC #15,254 · 19 patents
- Encodia, Inc. #15,255 · 19 patents
- Endochoice Innovation Center Ltd. #15,257 · 19 patents
- Epic Lift Systems #15,258 · 19 patents
- Espera-Werke GmbH #15,259 · 19 patents
- Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. #15,260 · 19 patents
Leaders in A61N (Electrotherapy)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in EndoStim's primary technology class.
- Medtronic, Inc. 2,200 in class
- Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation 1,080 in class
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. 1,037 in class
- Pacesetter, Inc. 609 in class
- Zoll Medical Corporation 556 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 534 in class
- Cochlear Limited 449 in class
- Varian Medical Systems, Inc. 296 in class
Endostim's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 15.8% |
| 2016 | 3 | 15.8% |
| 2017 | 7 | 36.8% |
| 2018 | 2 | 10.5% |
| 2019 | 4 | 21.1% |
Which technologies does EndoStim, Inc. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
EndoStim, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- EndoStim, Inc.'s lead technology class is A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61N
- Ranked #15,254 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare EndoStim, Inc. against Elucent Medical, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.