Where does EBM Papst Landshut GmbH rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), EBM Papst Landshut GmbH ranks #15,974 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does EBM Papst Landshut GmbH hold?

EBM Papst Landshut GmbH holds 18 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 20 technology areas.

What is EBM Papst Landshut GmbH's Innovation Score?

EBM Papst Landshut GmbH has an Innovation Score of 46.9 out of 100 (top 20% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does EBM Papst Landshut GmbH focus on?

EBM Papst Landshut GmbH's top technology area is F23N (Regulating OR Controlling Combustion) with 6 patents, ranking #32 of 188 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 20 CPC subclasses total.

Is EBM Papst Landshut GmbH's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

EBM Papst Landshut GmbH's recent grant velocity is +25% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for EBM Papst Landshut GmbH's patents?

EBM Papst Landshut GmbH's patents average 12.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the EBM Papst Landshut GmbH patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

EBM Papst Landshut GmbH

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 20 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F23N (Regulating OR Controlling Combustion).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, EBM ranks #15,974 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 20 technology areas.

#15,974
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 20%
by Innovation Score (46.9/100): 12.6
avg claims per patent: +25%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R15974 · Foreign Corporation #15,974 · 18 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
MID-PACK #15,974/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Dr Falk Pharma
CPC-FOCUS F23N · 20 areas
INNOV-PAR 46.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.6 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-UP +25% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Dr. Falk Pharma Gmbh (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How EBM’s 46.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.2 pts (22%) Velocity 13.3 pts (28%) Breadth 15.8 pts (34%) Claim depth 7.5 pts (16%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
EBM Papst Landshut · this assignee

47
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows EBM's Innovation Score is 46.9/100 (top 20% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for EBM?

Each dot is one of EBM’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). EBM’s own 12.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

EBM vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where EBM's grants concentrate

EBM Papst Landshut GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 20 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under F23N (Regulating OR Controlling Combustion). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, EBM sits between Dr. Falk Pharma Gmbh and Electrophoretics Limited.

EBM's three-year grant acceleration

EBM Papst Landshut GmbH shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Dr Falk Pharma

18
Dreame Innovation…

18
Dupont Specialty…

18
Eagleburgmann Jap…

18
Ebner Industrieof…

18
Ecom Instruments

18
Electrical Subsea…

18
Electrophoretics

18
EBM Papst Landshut ◀

18

What this shows EBM holds 18 patents at rank #15,972, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near EBM

By rank, the assignees closest to #15,972 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F23N (Regulating OR Controlling Combustion)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in EBM's primary technology class.

EBM's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

47 Top 20% higher than 80% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

EBM Papst Landshut GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	11.1%
2016	1	5.6%
2017	2	11.1%
2018	1	5.6%
2019	2	11.1%
2020	2	11.1%
2022	3	16.7%
2023	2	11.1%
2024	3	16.7%

Which technologies does EBM Papst Landshut GmbH patent most?

F23N - Regulating OR Controlling Combustion 6

F04D - Non-positive-displacement Pumps 5

F16K - VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating 4

G05D - Systems FOR Controlling OR Regulating Non-electric Variables 3

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 3

F16F - SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration 2

F23D - Burners 2

F23C - Methods OR Apparatus FOR Combustion Using Fluid Fuel OR Solid Fuel Suspended IN ; A Carrier GAS OR; AIR 1

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 1

F16M - Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

F23K - Feeding Fuel TO Combustion Apparatus 1

G01R - Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables 1

H02P - Control OR Regulation OF Electric Motors, Electric Generators OR Dynamo-electric CONVERTERS; Controlling Transformers, Reactors OR Choke Coils 1

C03B - Manufacture, Shaping, OR Supplementary Processes 1

Top 15 of 20 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

EBM Papst Landshut GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

EBM Papst Landshut GmbH's lead technology class is F23N (Regulating OR Controlling Combustion), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F23N
Ranked #15,974 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare EBM Papst Landshut GmbH against Dr. Falk Pharma Gmbh, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 46.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.