Easton Baseball/Softball Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Easton ranks #28,623 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #28,623
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 12th percentile
- by Innovation Score (23.3/100)
- 15.4
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R28623 · US Corporation #28,623 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #28,623/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Eagantu
- CPC-NARROW A63B · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 23.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Eagantu Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Easton’s 23.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Easton
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Easton Baseball/Soft… · this assignee 23
Easton Baseball/Soft… · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Easton's Innovation Score is 23.3/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Easton?
Each dot is one of Easton’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Easton’s own 15.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Easton's grants concentrate
Easton Baseball/Softball Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 88.9% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Easton sits between Eyesense GMBH and Eickhof Columbaria, Inc..
Who files at Easton's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Eyesense
Eyesense GMBH
9 patents
- EYL
EYL Inc.
9 patents
- Ez-pro Texture
Ez-pro Texture Inc.
9 patents
- Eagantu
Eagantu Ltd.
9 patents
- Eaton S r L
Eaton S.r.L.
9 patents
- Echo360
Echo360, Inc
9 patents
- Ecosphere
Ecosphere Technologies, Inc.
9 patents
- Eickhof Columbaria
Eickhof Columbaria, Inc.
9 patents
- Easton Baseball/S… ◀
Easton Baseball/Softball Inc.
9 patents
What this shows Easton holds 9 patents at rank #28,672, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Easton
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,672 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Easton's primary technology class.
- Acushnet Company 1,084 in class
- Nike, Inc. 843 in class
- Karsten Manufacturing Corporation 819 in class
- Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. 512 in class
- Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. 436 in class
- Callaway Golf Company 398 in class
- Dunlop Sports Co., Ltd. 301 in class
- Parsons Xtreme Golf, LLC 264 in class
Easton's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2016 | 5 | 55.6% |
| 2017 | 3 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Easton Baseball/Softball Inc. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Easton Baseball/Softball Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Easton Baseball/Softball Inc.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 88.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
- Ranked #28,623 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Easton Baseball/Softball Inc. against Eyesense GMBH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 23.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.