Overall rank by patents
#28,670
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B05B (SPRAYING APPARATUS; ATOMISING APPARATUS; NOZZLES).
The verdict
Ez-pro holds 9 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #28,670 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Ez-pro Texture Inc. has been granted 9 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Ez-pro Texture Inc. at rank #28,670 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in B05B (SPRAYING APPARATUS; ATOMISING APPARATUS; NOZZLES). As a US Corporation, Ez-pro Texture Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Ez-pro sits between Exterran Water Solutions ULC (9 patents, rank #28,666) and Echo360, Inc (9 patents, rank #28,674) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 31.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 4 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a -20% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Ez-pro Texture Inc.'s 17.0 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Ez-pro Texture Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
EXTERRAN WATER SOLUTIONS ULC
9 patents
EXoCoBio Inc.
9 patents
EYESENSE GMBH
9 patents
EYL INC.
9 patents
Eagantu Ltd.
9 patents
Easton Baseball/Softball Inc.
9 patents
Eaton S.r.L.
9 patents
Echo360, Inc
9 patents
EZ-PRO TEXTURE INC.
9 patents
What this shows Ez-pro holds 9 patents at rank #28,670, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,670 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Ez-pro's primary technology class.
Ez-pro's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 Top 61% higher than 39% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2017 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2018 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2021 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2023 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2024 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2025 | 1 | 11.1% |
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#28,670
Across all tracked assignees
31.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Ez-pro's 9 grants land it in the top 61% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.